Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Deutsche Post AG and Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-463/10 P)
The appeals
Findings of the Court
65

Deutsche Post AG and Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-463/10 P)

Judgment of 13 Oct 2011law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-463-10/para_65@2026-11-12

65In that respect, it should be recalled that, under the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU, a natural or legal person may institute proceedings against a decision addressed to another only if the decision is of direct and individual concern to that natural or legal person.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-463/10 P · ECLI:EU:C:2011:656
Decided: 13 Oct 2011
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62008TO0571, 62008TO0570
Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany
Rapporteur: K. Lenaerts
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, J. Malenovsky, R. Silva de Lapuerta, E. Juhász, D. Sváby
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0463

Topics

History · 1 version

13 Oct 2011Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-571/08); Deutsche Post AG v European Commission (T-570/08)
Cited by 23: Swissgrid AG v European Commission (T-127/21); Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-557/23); Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-558/23); Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-556/23); Sberbank of Russia PAO v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (SRB) (C-791/23); Sberbank of Russia PAO v Single Resolution Board (SRB) (C-793/23); Sberbank of Russia PAO v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (SRB) (C-792/23); Swissgrid AG v European Commission (C-121/23 P)3 provisions; Giovanni Frajese v European Commission (C-586/23 P); European Commission v Single Resolution Board (SRB) (C-551/22 P); Inivos Ltd and Inivos BV v European Commission (T-38/21); PNB Banka AS and Others v Single Resolution Board (T-732/19); Maria del Carmen Sánchez-Gavito León v Council of the European Union and European Commission (T-100/21); PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank (T-275/19); Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission (T-469/20); Francesca Corneli v European Central Bank (T-502/19); International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission (C-619/20 P); Illumina, Inc. v European Commission (T-227/21); ABLV Bank AS v Single Resolution Board (T-280/18); Ernests Bernis and Others v Single Resolution Board (C-364/20); Algebris (UK) Ltd and Anchorage Capital Group LLC v Single Resolution Board (C-934/19 P); Romania v European Commission (T-495/19); Danilo Poggiolini v European Parliament (C-408/20 P)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Guérin automobiles v Commission of the European Communities (C-282/95 P); Orkem v Commission of the European Communities (374/87); Sniace SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-260/05 P); Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Communities (22/70); International Business Machines Corporation v Commission of the European Communities (60/81); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-443/97); Athinaïki Techniki AE v Commission of the European Communities (C-521/06); Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV v European Commission (C-362/08); NDSHT Nya Destination Stockholm Hotell & Teaterpaket AB v European Commission (C-322/09 P); Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union (C-370/07); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-316/91); EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities (C-147/96); AKZO Chemie BV and AKZO Chemie UK Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (53/85); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-138/03, C-324/03, C-431/03); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-261/99); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; Commission of the European Communities v Ente per le Ville Vesuviane and Ente per le Ville Vesuviane v Commission of the European Communities (C-445/07)