Judgment_paragraph 47 · Henk Altmann and Margaret Casson v Commission of the European Communities (T-177/94, T-377/94)

47However, in accordance with consistent case-law, the second, third, fifth and sixth heads of claim, seeking the issue of directions to the Commission, must be dismissed as inadmissible. The Community judicature is not entitled, when exercising judicial review of legality, to issue directions to the institutions, it being for the administration concerned to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment delivered in an action for annulment (Case C-100/88 Oyowe and Traore v Commission [1989] ECR 4285, paragraph 19; see, most recently, Case T-109/94 Windpark Groothusen v Commission [1995] ECR II-3007).

Henk Altmann and Margaret Casson v Commission of the European Communities (T-177/94, T-377/94)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections