Contents
- 1. The audit authority shall select a random statistical samp…
- 2. Where the audit authority uses the MUS standard approach,…
- 3. Where the audit authority uses SRS, it shall select a samp…
- 4. Annexes I and II set out sampling parameters and formulas…
- 5. The sample shall have at least 30 units and at least 3 uni…
- 6. In the case of multi-period sampling, the audit authority…
- 7. As regards programmes assessed in category 1 or 2 as set o…
Article 5Selection of a random statistical sample#
1.The audit authority shall select a random statistical sample, from the population established in accordance with Articles 3 and 4, using one of the following methods:
(a)the MUS standard approach;
(b)Simple Random Sampling (‘SRS’).
2.Where the audit authority uses the MUS standard approach, it shall select a sample using PPS.The low value units shall be selected on the basis of an interval of selection calculated using the expenditure of a low value stratum after determining an exhaustive high value stratum. All high value units above the interval of selection shall be audited, subject to exceptions provided in Article 3(6), first subparagraph, points (a) and (b), and third subparagraph.
3.Where the audit authority uses SRS, it shall select a sample using equal probability selection, with the optional use of an exhaustive stratum.
4.Annexes I and II set out sampling parameters and formulas to calculate the sample size for the methods referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) and (b), except where the capped sample size referred to in paragraph 7 is applied. Those formulas may be used with different sampling designs covering stratification or multi-period sampling or a combination of both.
5.The sample shall have at least 30 units and at least 3 units in each random stratum of a sampling period.
6.In the case of multi-period sampling, the audit authority shall apply one of the following approaches to recalculate the sample size in order to adjust to updated sampling parameters:
(a)standard recalculation of the sample size;
(b)global recalculation of the sample size.
Where the audit authority uses the approach of the standard recalculation of the sample size as referred to in point (a), the sample size of subsequent sampling period or periods shall be recalculated while maintaining the sample sizes of previous sampling periods of the accounting year.Where the audit authority uses the approach of the global recalculation of the sample size as referred to in point (b), both the total sample size and the sample size per sampling period shall be recalculated.
7.As regards programmes assessed in category 1 or 2 as set out in Table 2 of Annex XI to Regulation (EU) 2021/1060, which are not subject to enhanced proportionate arrangements pursuant to Article 83 of that Regulation, the audit authority may cap the sample size at 50 sampling units.Where the capped sample size referred to in the first subparagraph is used, it shall be applied to a sample for the whole population comprising, where applicable, more than one programme and programming periods.All units in random strata and only high value units in exhaustive strata shall count for the capped sample size.Multi-period sampling procedures may be applied with the capped sample size. In case of underestimated forecasts of population size or expenditure for the second or subsequent sampling periods, the audit authority shall take one of the following actions:
(a)increase the sample size to take into consideration the underestimated values of the forecasts;
(b)calculate the sample size in accordance with the formulas set out in Annex II.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.