ECB/2023/24 · GlobalLawDB

Contents

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions^note, and in particular Articles 5(1) and 6(1) thereof,Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2014 establishing the framework for cooperation within the Single Supervisory Mechanism between the European Central Bank and national competent authorities and with national designated authorities (SSM Framework Regulation) (ECB/2014/17)^note, and in particular Article 101 thereof,Whereas:

(1)The European Central Bank (ECB) is responsible for the effective and consistent functioning of the Single Supervisory Mechanism and has been entrusted with both micro and macroprudential tasks. The conferral of macroprudential tasks reinforces the contributory role of the ECB to financial stability already enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

(2)The national competent authorities (NCAs) and national designated authorities (NDAs) are responsible for setting buffer rates for global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs) and other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs).

(3)Pursuant to Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013, the NCAs or NDAs of the participating Member States, whenever appropriate or deemed required, apply requirements for capital buffers to be held by credit institutions at the relevant level with the aim of addressing systemic or macroprudential risks.

(4)In accordance with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and Article 104 of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014, NCAs or NDAs notify the ECB of their intention to apply macroprudential measures ten working days prior to taking such a decision (notification of ‘intended macroprudential measures’). Upon receipt of the notification, the Secretary of the Supervisory Board transmits the intended macroprudential measures, to the Governing Council and the Supervisory Board without delay. Upon a proposal prepared by the Supervisory Board, based on the intended initiative and taking into account the input of the relevant committee and ECB internal structure, the Governing Council decides within three working days whether or not to raise objections. Where the Governing Council objects to the intended macroprudential measures, it explains its reasons in writing to the NCAs or NDAs within five working days of the notification to the ECB. The NCAs or NDAs consider the ECB’s reasons prior to proceeding with the final decision, as appropriate.

(5)The ECB is required to assess a substantial number of intended macroprudential measures submitted by NCAs or NDAs, including those that set O-SII and G-SII buffers. Those assessments often need to be conducted within a very tight timeframe. In order to facilitate the decision-making process, it is appropriate to provide for the delegation of the power to adopt certain decisions within the ECB. In particular, the power to adopt decisions not to object to macroprudential measures submitted by NCAs or NDAs should be delegated to heads of work units of the ECB. Global systemically important banks or institutions (G-SIBs-G-SIIs) are banks or institutions that are perceived as not being allowed to fail due to their size, interconnectedness, complexity, lack of substitutability or global scope. Given the potential cross-jurisdictional repercussions of a problem in any of the G-SIBs-G-SIIs on other financial institutions in many countries and on the global economy at large, this is not uniquely a problem for NCAs or NDAs, and therefore requires harmonisation at the global level which is reflected in a global agreement reached by the members of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Financial Stability Board the outcome of which is published by the Financial Stability Board. The global community is addressing these issues through a multipronged approach.

(6)The Court of Justice of the European Union has recognised delegation of authority to be necessary and appropriate to enable an institution required to adopt a considerable number of decisions to perform its duties. The powers conferred on an institution include the right to delegate, in compliance with the provisions of the TFEU, a certain number of those powers, subject to any conditions specified by the institution. A Union institution may therefore establish measures of an organisational nature, delegating its decision-making powers to its own internal bodies or persons, insofar as such measures are justified and respect the principle of proportionality. In order to ensure legal certainty, the delegation of decision-making powers should be both limited and proportionate, and the scope of the delegation should be clearly defined and subject to conditions specified by the institution.

(7)On 24 June 2020, the Governing Council decided to establish close cooperation between the ECB and Българска народна банка (Bulgarian National Bank)^note. For the purposes of close cooperation, the decision not to object to intended macroprudential measures concerning the Republic of Bulgaria will be also adopted pursuant to the relevant provisions of this Decision.

(8)Where the criteria for the adoption of a delegated decision are not met, decisions should be adopted in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and Article 13h of Decision ECB/2004/2 of the European Central Bank^note,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: