Judgment_paragraph 1 · Belaruskali AAT and Others v Council of the European Union (C-816/24 P)

1By their respective appeals, Belaruskali AAT, Mr Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty and Belarusian Potash Company AAT (‘BPC’) seek to have set aside, first (Case C‑816/24 P), the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 18 September 2024, Belaruskali v Council (T‑528/22, EU:T:2024:633; ‘the first judgment under appeal’); second (Case C‑817/24 P), the judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2024, Golovaty v Council (T‑521/22, EU:T:2024:631; ‘the second judgment under appeal’); and, third (Case C‑818/24 P), the judgment of the General Court o 18 September 2024, Belarusian Potash Company v Council (T‑534/22, EU:T:2024:632; ‘the third judgment under appeal’). By way of those judgments (together, ‘the judgments under appeal’), the General Court dismissed their respective actions seeking annulment of (i) Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/881 of 3 June 2022 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 77) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/876 of 3 June 2022 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 1) (together, ‘the initial acts at issue’), and (ii) Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/421 of 24 February 2023 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 41) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 of 24 February 2023 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 20), in so far as those acts (together, ‘the acts at issue’) concern the appellants respectively.

Belaruskali AAT and Others v Council of the European Union (C-816/24 P)

Connections

History · 1 version

Key facts