Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Russisch-Kirgizisch Ontwikkelingsfonds v Belgische Staat (C-384/24)
Consideration of the questions referred
38

Russisch-Kirgizisch Ontwikkelingsfonds v Belgische Staat (C-384/24)

law://eu/cjeu/2024/c-384-24/para_38@2026-11-12

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Tenth Chamber
Case: C-384/24 · ECLI:EU:C:2025:696
Decided: 11 Sept 2025
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Raad van State (Council of State, Belgium)
Applicant: Russisch-Kirgizisch Ontwikkelingsfonds
Defendant: Belgische Staat
Rapporteur: D. Gratsias
Advocate General: R. Norkus
Bench: 3 judges
D. Gratsias, E. Regan, B. Smulders
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62024CJ0384

Topics

Charter of Fundamental Rights Common foreign and security policy Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

11 Sept 2025Reading

38In that regard, the Court has already held, in the comparable context of Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2006 L 134, p. 1), as amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 of 31 January 2011 (OJ 2011 L 28, p. 17) and Council Regulation (EU) No 588/2011 of 20 June 2011 (OJ 2011 L 161, p. 1), that when deciding on a request for release of frozen funds pursuant to Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation No 765/2006, the competent national authority implements EU law. It follows that that authority is required to observe the Charter, as provided for in Article 51(1) thereof (judgment of 12 June 2014, Peftiev and Others, C‑314/13, EU:C:2014:1645, paragraph 24).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Judgment of 11 Sept 2025

Connections

Interprets 2: Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014; Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Užsienio reikalų ministerija and Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba v Vladimir Peftiev and Others (C-314/13)2 provisions; GM and ON v PR (C-109/23); Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus; Proceedings brought by Centraal Justitieel Incassobureau, Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie (CJIB) (C-671/18); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-632/20 P); Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 of 31 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus; Council Regulation (EU) No 588/2011 of 20 June 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus