Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Mainova AG v European Commission (C-484/23 P)
The procedure before the Court of Just…
22

Mainova AG v European Commission (C-484/23 P)

law://eu/cjeu/2023/c-484-23/para_22@2026-11-15

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-484/23 P · ECLI:EU:C:2025:482
Decided: 26 Jun 2025
Procedure: Appeal
Ruled invalid: 62020TJ0320
Applicant: Mainova AG
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: J. Passer
Advocate General: L. Medina
Bench: 5 judges
M.L. Arastey Sahún, D. Gratsias, E. Regan, J. Passer, B. Smulders
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62023CJ0484

Topics

Concentrations between undertakings

History · 1 version

26 Jun 2025Reading

22By decision of 19 September 2023, the President of the Court of Justice, after hearing the parties on that request for a stay of proceedings and on a possible joinder of nine appeals – including the present appeal – in Cases C‑464/23 P, C‑465/23 P, C‑466/23 P, C‑467/23 P, C‑468/23 P, C‑469/23 P, C‑470/23 P, C‑484/23 P and C‑485/23 P, brought against the judgments of the General Court in Cases T‑312/20, T‑313/20, T‑314/20, T‑315/20, T‑317/20, T‑318/20, T‑319/20, T‑320/20 and T‑321/20, dismissed that request for a stay of proceedings and ordered that only the appeals in Cases C‑464/23 P, C‑465/23 P, C‑467/23 P, C‑468/23 P and C‑470/23 P concerning judgments of the General Court delivered on the substance, to the exclusion of the four other appeals, including the present appeal, brought against judgments delivered by the General Court declaring the actions inadmissible, be joined.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Judgment of 26 Jun 2025

Connections

Interprets 1: Mainova AG v European Commission (T-320/20)
Cited by 1: Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency (C-136/24 P)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004; EVH GmbH and Others v European Commission (C-464/23); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-525/04 P); easyJet Airline Co. Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-177/04); EVH GmbH v European Commission (T-312/20); France Télécom SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-202/07); Commission of the European Communities v Jégo-Quéré & Cie SA (C-263/02 P); French Republic and Société commerciale des potasses et de l'azote (SCPA) and Entreprise minière et chimique (EMC) v Commission of the European Communities (C-68/94, C-30/95); Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council of the European Union (C-50/00 P); Compagnie française de l'azote (Cofaz) SA and others v Commission of the European Communities (169/84); Association médicale européenne (EMA) v European Commission (C-100/14); BaByliss SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-114/02); Lenzing AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-36/99); Land Rheinland-Pfalz v Deutsche Lufthansa AG (C-466/21 P); Mainova AG v European Commission (T-320/20); Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe „Primart” Marek Łukasiewicz v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-702/18 P)