ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (C-364/23 P)

Judgment of 12 Jun 2025

law://eu/cjeu/2023/c-364-23/para_34@2026-11-14

34Furthermore, in so far as EUIPO submits that the appellant reproduces the pleas in law and arguments already submitted before the General Court, it must be borne in mind that, provided that an appellant challenges the interpretation or application of EU law by the General Court, the points of law examined at first instance may be discussed again in the course of an appeal. Indeed, if an appellant could not thus base his or her appeal on pleas in law and arguments already relied on before the General Court, an appeal would be deprived of part of its purpose (judgment of 4 October 2024, Aeris Invest v Commission and SRB, C‑535/22 P, EU:C:2024:819, paragraph 106 and the case-law cited).

ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (C-364/23 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections