Judgment_paragraph 92 · Belaruskali AAT v Council of the European Union (T-528/22)

92It should be noted that the wording itself of Article 4(1)(b) of Decision 2012/642, to which Article 2(5) of Regulation No 765/2012 refers, makes reference to ‘supporting’ the Lukashenko regime. Thus, the mere fact that the applicant pays dividends to the Belarusian State – which are therefore at the disposal of the Lukashenko regime – along with compulsory contributions to the State target budget fund for national development is sufficient to establish the existence of financial support.

Belaruskali AAT v Council of the European Union (T-528/22)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version