Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
AS 'Latvijas valsts meži' v Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde and Vides pārraudzības valsts birojs (C-434/22)
Consideration of the questions referred
The fourth question
63

AS 'Latvijas valsts meži' v Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde and Vides pārraudzības valsts birojs (C-434/22)

law://eu/cjeu/2022/c-434-22/para_63@2026-11-12

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Ninth Chamber
Case: C-434/22 · ECLI:EU:C:2023:966
Decided: 7 Dec 2023
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the administratīvā rajona tiesa, Rīgas tiesu nams (District Administrative Court, Riga Section, Latvia)
Applicant: Latvijas valsts meži AS
Defendants: Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde; Vides pārraudzības valsts birojs
Intervener: Valsts meža dienests
Rapporteur: J.-C. Bonichot
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 3 judges
J.-C. Bonichot, S. Rodin, L.S. Rossi
Language: Latvian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62022CJ0434

Topics

History · 1 version

7 Dec 2023Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora
Cites 16: Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL and Bond Beter Leefmilieu Vlaanderen ASBL v Conseil des ministres (C-411/17); Peter Sweetman and Others v An Bord Pleanála (C-258/11)2 provisions; Directive 2011/92/EU; European Commission v Ireland (C-261/18); Landelijke Vereniging tot Behoud van de Waddenzee and Nederlandse Vereniging tot Bescherming van Vogels v Staatssecretaris van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij (C-127/02)2 provisions; European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-441/17); Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora; The Queen, on the application of Delena Wells v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (C-201/02); Jean Humblet v Kingdom of Belgium (6/60); Dansk Akvakultur v Miljø- og Fødevareklagenævnet (C-278/21); Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd v An Bord Pleanála (C-254/19); European Commission v Slovak Republic (C-661/20); AS 'Latvijas valsts meži' v Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde and Vides pārraudzības valsts birojs (C-434/22); Hilde Orleans and Others v Vlaams Gewest (C-387/15, C-388/15); Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest and Others v Vlaamse Gewest (C-275/09)

Judgment of 7 Dec 2023

63The Court has repeatedly confirmed the preliminary nature of the assessment procedure provided for in Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive (judgments of 7 September 2004, Waddenvereniging and Vogelbeschermingsvereniging, C‑127/02, EU:C:2004:482, paragraph 34; of 11 April 2013, Sweetman and Others, C‑258/11, EU:C:2013:220, paragraph 28; and of 21 July 2016, Orleans and Others, C‑387/15 and C‑388/15, EU:C:2016:583, paragraph 43).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.