Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
IFIC Holding AG v European Commission (T-8/21)
Law
The first plea in law, alleging an inf…
125

IFIC Holding AG v European Commission (T-8/21)

Judgment of 12 Jul 2023law://eu/cjeu/2021/t-8-21/para_125@2026-11-10

125The assessment of that question must, moreover, be made in the light of the factual and legal circumstances of each case (see, to that effect, judgment of 18 June 2020, Commission v RQ, C‑831/18 P, EU:C:2020:481, paragraph 107).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Sixth Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-8/21 · ECLI:EU:T:2023:387
Decided: 12 Jul 2023
Procedure: application to intervene
Applicant: IFIC Holding AG
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: Marcoulli
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62021TJ0008

Topics

Common commercial policy

History · 1 version

12 Jul 2023Reading

Connections

Cited by 2: Fritz Egger GmbH & Co. OG and Others v European Chemicals Agency (T-163/23); Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-727/20 R)2 provisions
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Bank Melli Iran v Telekom Deutschland GmbH (C-124/20); Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 of 22 November 1996 protecting against the effects of the extra-territorial application of legislation adopted by a third country, and actions based thereon or resulting therefrom; Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1100 of 6 June 2018 amending the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 protecting against the effects of extra-territorial application of legislation adopted by a third country, and actions based thereon or resulting therefrom; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1101 of 3 August 2018 laying down the criteria for the application of the second paragraph of Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 protecting against the effects of the extra-territorial application of legislation adopted by a third country, and actions based thereon or resulting therefrom; Bank Melli Iran v Telekom Deutschland GmbH (C-124/20); Council of the European Union v Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH and C. H. Boehringer Sohn (C-23/00 P); European Commission v RQ (C-831/18 P)2 provisions; M. G. and N. R. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-383/13 PPU); M v Minister for Justice and Equality Ireland and the Attorney General (C-560/14); Alexios Anagnostakis v European Commission (C-589/15 P); European Commission v Freistaat Bayern and Others (C-167/19 P)