Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
European Commission v RQ (C-831/18 P)
The appeal
The third ground of appeal, alleging a…
Findings of the Court
107

European Commission v RQ (C-831/18 P)

law://eu/cjeu/2018/c-831-18/para_107@2026-11-14

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-831/18 P · ECLI:EU:C:2020:481
Decided: 18 Jun 2020
Procedure: Appeal
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: RQ
Rapporteur: M. Vilaras
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
M. Vilaras, S. Rodin, D. Šváby, K. Jürimäe, N. Piçarra
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018CJ0831

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

18 Jun 2020Reading

Judgment of 18 Jun 2020

107The assessment of that question must, moreover, be made in the light of the factual and legal circumstances of each case (see, to that effect, judgment of 10 September 2013, G. and R., C‑383/13 PPU, EU:C:2013:533, paragraph 40).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 22: MG v European Investment Bank (C-173/22 P); Isabel Sánchez v European Commission (T-229/24)2 provisions; PS v European External Action Service (T-594/23); Independent Farmers Organisation of Ireland Ltd v European Commission (T-62/24); MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (T-523/22); MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (T-524/22); European Parliament v TC (C-529/23); MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v Single Resolution Board (T-450/22); Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank (ECB) (C-90/23); Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-297/23); Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-298/23); Aleksandra Melnichenko v Council of the European Union (T-498/22); Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-727/20 R)2 provisions; Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission (T-671/19)2 provisions; Bytedance Ltd v European Commission (T-077/23); Angel Angelidis v European Parliament (T-49/23); Roberto Passalacqua v European Commission (T-318/22); Michael Heßler v European Commission (T-369/22); Antonio Del Valle Ruíz and Others v Single Resolution Board (T-302/20); PNB Banka AS and Others v Single Resolution Board (T-732/19); XC v European Commission (C-527/21); Alexey Mordashov v Council of the European Union (T-248/22)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); RQ v European Commission (T-29/17); Kamino International Logistics BV and Datema Hellmann Worldwide Logistics BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-129/13, C-130/13); Commission of the European Communities v CAS Succhi di Frutta SpA (C-496/99 P); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Commission (C-416/11); Rami Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (C-458/17); Trubowest Handel GmbH and Viktor Makarov v Council of the European Union and European Commission (C-419/08); M. G. and N. R. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-383/13 PPU); Giancarlo Bossi v European Commission (346/87); Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament (T-346/11, T-347/11); Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (C-141/08); Jean Humblet v Kingdom of Belgium (6/60); General Motors BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-551/03); Konstantinos Mallis and Others v European Commission and European Central Bank (ECB) (C-105/15 P, C-106/15 P, C-107/15 P, C-108/15 P, C-109/15 P); Ashley Neil Mote v European Parliament (T-345/05); J. J. Zwartveld and others (C-2/88); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68; M. M. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Others (C-277/11); European Commission v Maria Dolores Fernández Gómez (C-417/05 P)