Judgment_paragraph 88 · European Union Intellectual Property Office v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR (C-382/21 P)

88In the present case, in the light of the fact that the action for annulment brought by KaiKai in Case T‑579/19 is based on pleas that were the subject of an exchange of arguments before the General Court and the examination of which does not require any further measure of organisation of procedure or inquiry to be taken in the case, the Court of Justice considers that the state of the proceedings is such that it may give final judgment in the matter and it is therefore appropriate that it does so, within the limits of the matter before it (see, by analogy, judgments of 8 September 2020, Commission and Council v Carreras Sequeros and Others, C‑119/19 P and C‑126/19 P, EU:C:2020:676, paragraph 130, and of 4 March 2021, Commission v Fútbol Club Barcelona, C‑362/19 P, EU:C:2021:169, paragraph 108).