Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Lux Express Estonia AS v Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium (C-614/20)
Consideration of the questions referred
The second question
52

Lux Express Estonia AS v Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium (C-614/20)

Judgment of 8 Sept 2022law://eu/cjeu/2020/c-614-20/para_52@2026-11-11

52That provision thus lays down the principle that public service obligations and the compensation relating thereto must be established in the context of a public service contract.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-614/20 · ECLI:EU:C:2022:641
Decided: 8 Sept 2022
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tallina Halduskohus (Administrative Court, Tallinn, Estonia)
Applicant: Lux Express Estonia AS
Defendant: Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona
Bench: 3 judges
A. Arabadjiev, P.G. Xuereb, A. Kumin
Language: Estonian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62020CJ0614

Topics

State aid Transport

History · 1 version

8 Sept 2022Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70
Cited by 2: SIA 'DOBELES AUTOBUSU PARKS' and Others v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and VSIA 'Autotransporta direkcija' (C-421/22)2 provisions; United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission (C-297/22 P)
Cites 9: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; A.H. v Zagrebačka banka d.d (C-567/20); Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 of the Council of 26 June 1969 on action by Member States concerning the obligations inherent in the concept of a public service in transport by rail, road and inland waterway; 65/271/EEC: Council Decision of 13 May 1965 on the harmonisation of certain provisions affecting competition in transport by rail, road and inland waterway; Council Regulation (EEC) No 1893/91 of 20 June 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 on action by Member States concerning the obligations inherent in the concept of a public service in transport by rail, road and inland waterway; Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht (C-280/00); Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70; Associação Nacional de Transportadores Rodoviários de Pesados de Passageiros (Antrop) and Others v Conselho de Ministros, Companhia Carris de Ferro de Lisboa SA (Carris) and Sociedade de Transportes Colectivos do Porto SA (STCP) (C-504/07)