Paula Correia v European Economic and Social Committee (T-843/19)
law://eu/cjeu/2019/t-843-19/para_86@2026-11-14
86According to the case-law, the annulment of an unlawful measure such as the contested decision constitutes, in itself, adequate and, in principle, sufficient compensation for all non-material damage which that measure may have caused, except where the applicant shows that he or she has suffered non-material damage which is separable from the unlawfulness which is the basis for the annulment and which is incapable of being entirely repaired by that annulment (see judgments of 19 May 2015, Brune v Commission, F‑59/14, EU:F:2015:50, paragraph 80 and the case-law cited, and of 16 July 2015, Murariu v AEAPP, F‑116/14, EU:F:2015:89, paragraph 150 and the case-law cited).