150As for the alleged non-material harm, it should be remembered that, according to settled case-law, the annulment of an unlawful measure such as the contested decision constitutes, in itself, adequate and, in principle, sufficient compensation for all non-material damage which that measure may have caused, except where the applicant shows that he has suffered non-material damage which is separable from the unlawfulness which is the basis for the annulment and which is incapable of being entirely repaired by that annulment (see, to that effect, judgments of 6 June 2006 in Girardot v Commission, T‑10/02, EU:T:2006:148, paragraph 131, and 19 November 2009 in Michail v Commission, T‑49/08 P, EU:T:2009:456, paragraph 88).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.