Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
John Dalli v European Commission (C-615/19 P)
The appeal
35

John Dalli v European Commission (C-615/19 P)

Judgment of 25 Feb 2021law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-615-19/para_35@2026-11-10

35In that regard, in the present case, the Court considers it appropriate to rule from the outset on the merits of the case (see, by analogy, judgments of 23 October 2007, Poland v Council, C‑273/04, EU:C:2007:622, paragraph 33, and of 7 March 2013, Switzerland v Commission, C‑547/10 P, EU:C:2013:139, paragraph 47).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-615/19 P · ECLI:EU:C:2021:133
Decided: 25 Feb 2021
Procedure: Appeal
Applicant: John Dalli
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 5 judges
J.‑C. Bonichot, L. Bay Larsen, C. Toader, M. Safjan, N. Jääskinen
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0615

Topics

Law governing the institutions

History · 1 version

25 Feb 2021Reading

Connections

Cited by 24: Criminal proceedings against V.S (C-205/21); Jean-Marc Colombani v European External Action Service (EEAS) (C-343/23 P); DM and DN v Mission d'assistance de l'Union européenne pour une gestion intégrée des frontières en Libye (EUBAM Libya) (T-198/24); PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank (C-102/23); Rems Kargins v European Commission (T-350/23); Thomas Bindl v European Commission (T-354/22); Jean-Marc Colombani v European External Action Service (T-158/23); European Commission v Intel Corporation Inc (C-240/22 P); Firearms United Network and Others v European Commission (C-105/23); XH v European Commission (T-11/23); Hanns Pfriem v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-316/23); Liam Jenkinson v Council of the European Union and Others (C-46/22 P)2 provisions; United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission (C-297/22 P); YD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (T-648/21); Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Others v European Parliament (T-272/21); International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission (T-752/20); PL v European Commission (C-537/21); PV v European Commission (C-640/20 P); Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission (T-537/18); KN v European Parliament (T-401/21); "Sistem ecologica" production, trade and services d.o.o. Srbac v European Commission (T-81/21); Eleveté Invest Group, SL and Others v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (T-523/17); Leon Leonard Johan Veen v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (T-436/21); Fulmen v Council of the European Union (C-680/19)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Safa Nicu Sepahan Co. v Council of the European Union (C-45/15 P); Commission of the European Communities v European Central Bank (C-11/00); Criminal proceedings against AH and Others (C-377/18); Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union (C-521/15); Tarif Akhras v Council of the European Union (C-193/15 P); European Union Satellite Centre v KF (C-14/19 P); Yves Franchet and Daniel Byk v European Commission (T-48/05); Swiss Confederation v European Commission (C-547/10 P)2 provisions; John Dalli v European Commission (T-562/12); Terna SpA v European Commission (C-812/18); Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF); Activision Blizzard Germany GmbH v European Commission (C-260/09 P); Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999; Appeals – Actions for damages – Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU – Excessive length of the proceedings in a case before the General Court of the European Union – Compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant – Concept of a ‘single undertaking’ not applied – Material damage – Bank guarantee costs – Causal link – Loss of profit – Non-pecuniary damage – Liability of the European Union for damage caused by infringements of EU law arising from a decision of the General Court – No incurring of liability (C-447/17 P, C-479/17 P); John Dalli v European Commission (T-399/17); České dráhy a.s. v European Commission (C-538/18); Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel and Remedia d.o.o. v European Commission (C-680/16 P)