Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Swiss Confederation v European Commission (C-547/10 P)
Judgment
The cross-appeal
47

Swiss Confederation v European Commission (C-547/10 P)

law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-547-10/para_47@2026-11-12

History · 1 version

7 Mar 2013Reading

47In the present case, the Court considers it necessary to rule at the outset on the substance of the case (Case C-273/04 Poland v Council [2007] ECR I-8925, paragraph 33).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 4: John Dalli v European Commission (C-615/19 P)2 provisions; Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-557/23); Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-558/23); Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-556/23)
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission (C-521/09 P); Interporc Im- und Export GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-41/00 P); Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes; Moser Baer India Ltd v Council of the European Union (C-535/06); Republic of Poland v Council of the European Union (C-273/04); Fokus Invest AG v Finanzierungsberatung-Immobilientreuhand und Anlageberatung GmbH (FIAG) (C-541/08); Confédération suisse v European Commission (T-319/05); 2004/12/EC: Commission Decision of 5 December 2003 on a procedure relating to the application of Article 18(2), first sentence, of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on air transport and Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 (Case TREN/AMA/11/03 — German measures relating to the approaches to Zurich airport) (notified under document number C(2003) 4472); Alcon Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-412/05 P); Les Éditions Albert René SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-16/06); Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-254/09 P); Sergio Rossi SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-214/05); Artegodan GmbH v European Commission (C-221/10 P); Girish Ojha v European Commission (C-294/95 P); Christian Grimme v Deutsche Angestellten-Krankenkasse (C-351/08); Alexander Hengartner and Rudolf Gasser v Landesregierung Vorarlberg (C-70/09)

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-547/10 P · ECLI:EU:C:2013:139
Decided: 7 Mar 2013
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Swiss Confederation
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: R. Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, K. Lenaerts, E. Juhász, T. von Danwitz, D. Šváby
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0547

Topics

General and final provisions International agreements Transport

Judgment of 7 Mar 2013