Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Kancelaria Medius SA v RN (C-495/19)
Consideration of the question referred
35

Kancelaria Medius SA v RN (C-495/19)

Judgment of 4 Jun 2020law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-495-19/para_35@2026-11-12

35In this respect, the Court ruled that, without effective review of whether the terms of the contract concerned are unfair, observance of the rights conferred by Directive 93/13 cannot be guaranteed (judgment of 13 September 2018, Profi Credit Polska, C–176/17, EU:C:2018:711, paragraph 62 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-495/19 · ECLI:EU:C:2020:431
Decided: 4 Jun 2020
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu (Regional Court, Poznań, Poland)
Applicant: Kancelaria Medius SA
Defendant: RN
Rapporteur: C. Toader
Advocate General: G. Pitruzzella
Bench: 3 judges
M. Safjan, C. Toader, N. Jääskinen
Language: Polish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0495

Topics

Approximation of laws Consumer protection

History · 1 version

4 Jun 2020Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Directive 93/13/EEC2 provisions
Cited by 10: MA v Ibercaja Banco, SA (C-600/19)2 provisions; L v Unicaja Banco SA (C-869/19)2 provisions; SPV Project 1503 Srl and Others v YB and Others v YX and ZW (C-693/19)2 provisions; IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA (C-725/19)2 provisions; SM and Others v mBank S.A (C-140/22); JZ v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt. and Others (C-932/19); Criminal proceedings against GR and Others (C-726/21); A v B and C (C-738/19); R.S (C-582/23); Promexor Trade Srl v Direcţia Generală a Finanţelor Publice Cluj – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bihor (C-358/20)
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Directive 93/13/EEC; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Ruxandra Paula Andriciuc and Others v Banca Românească SA (C-186/16); Györgyné Lintner v UniCredit Bank Hungary Zrt (C-511/17); Profi Credit Polska S.A. v Bogumiła Włostowska and Others and Profi Credit Polska S.A. v OH (C-419/18, C-483/18); Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej v Mariusz Wawrzosek (C-176/17)2 provisions; Aqua Med sp. z o.o.v Irena Skóra (C-266/18); Karel de Grote – Hogeschool Katholieke Hogeschool Antwerpen VZW v Susan Romy Jozef Kuijpers (C-147/16); Ottília Lovasné Tóth v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt (C-34/18); Ernst Georg Radlinger and Helena Radlingerová v Finway a.s (C-377/14); Zsolt Sziber v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt (C-483/16); Vera Egenberger v Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung e.V (C-414/16)