Judgment_paragraph 29 · Powiat Ostrowski v Ubezpieczeniowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny (C-383/19)

29In the first place it must be recalled that, in accordance with the Court’s settled case-law, in the context of the cooperation between the Court and the national courts provided for in Article 267 TFEU, it is solely for the national court before which the dispute has been brought, and which must assume responsibility for the subsequent judicial decision, to determine in the light of the particular circumstances of the case both the need for a preliminary ruling in order to enable it to deliver judgment and the relevance of the questions which it submits to the Court. Consequently, where the questions submitted concern the interpretation of EU law, the Court is, in principle, bound to give a ruling (judgments of 15 January 2013, Križan and Others, C‑416/10, EU:C:2013:8, paragraph 53 and the case-law cited, and of 24 November 2020, Openbaar Ministerie (Forgery of documents), C‑510/19, EU:C:2020:953, paragraph 25).

Powiat Ostrowski v Ubezpieczeniowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny (C-383/19)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections