Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Printeos, SA (C-301/19 P)
The appeal
The fifth ground of appeal: breach of…
Findings of the Court
95

European Commission v Printeos, SA (C-301/19 P)

Judgment of 20 Jan 2021law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-301-19/para_95@2026-11-11

95It follows that the Commission does not have the power to adopt, in an individual decision, the conditions under which it will pay default interest in the event of annulment of a decision imposing a fine which has been provisionally paid.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-301/19 P · ECLI:EU:C:2021:39
Decided: 20 Jan 2021
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62017TJ0201
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Printeos SA
Rapporteur: M. Vilaras
Advocate General: G. Pitruzzella
Bench: 5 judges
M. Vilaras, N. Piçarra, D. Šváby, S. Rodin, K. Jürimäe
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0301

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

20 Jan 2021Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Printeos, SA v European Commission (T-201/17)
Cited by 14: Malacalza Investimenti Srl and Vittorio Malacalza v European Central Bank (C-557/24 P); Air Canada v European Commission (T-310/21)4 provisions; SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (T-313/21); Banco Cooperativo Español, SA v Single Resolution Board (T-499/20)5 provisions; European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Indo European Foods Ltd (C-801/21 P); European Commission v Deutsche Telekom AG (C-221/22 P)2 provisions; BAWAG PSK Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft und Österreichische Postsparkasse AG v European Central Bank (T-667/21); QI and Others v European Commission and European Central Bank (C-262/22); Fachverband Spielhallen eV and LM v European Commission (C-831/21 P); Campine and Campine Recycling v European Commission (T-94/20); Neoperl AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-487/21); Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission (T-275/20); Eleveté Invest Group, SL and Others v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (T-523/17); Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-610/19)4 provisions
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Appeals – Actions for damages – Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU – Excessive length of the proceedings in a case before the General Court of the European Union – Compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant – Concept of a ‘single undertaking’ not applied – Material damage – Bank guarantee costs – Causal link – Loss of profit – Non-pecuniary damage – Liability of the European Union for damage caused by infringements of EU law arising from a decision of the General Court – No incurring of liability (C-447/17 P, C-479/17 P); Kingdom of Sweden v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) and European Commission, Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) v European Commission and European Commission v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) (C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P, C-532/07 P); Holcim (Deutschland) AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-282/05 P); Littlewoods Retail Ltd and Others v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs (C-591/10); Corus UK Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-171/99); Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on the rules of application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union; Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities; Laboratoires pharmaceutiques Bergaderm SA and Jean-Jacques Goupil v Commission of the European Communities (C-352/98 P); Ori Martin SA v Court of Justice of the European Union (C-463/17 P); Printeos, SA and Others v European Commission (T-95/15); European Commission v IPK International - World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH (C-336/13 P); Printeos, SA v European Commission (T-201/17); Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH and Gascogne v European Union (T-577/14); Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld (C-365/15); Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002