Judgment_paragraph 36 · B. v Centre public d'action sociale de Líège (CPAS) (C-233/19)

36Similarly, the Belgian Government’s claim that the national court did not have jurisdiction, under the rules of national law, to adopt a position on the suspensive effect of an appeal brought against a return decision does not suffice to lead to the inadmissibility of that question, in so far as it is not for the Court to call into question the national court’s assessment of the rules of national law governing the organisation of the courts and their procedure (see, to that effect, judgments of 16 June 2015, Gauweiler and Others, C‑62/14, EU:C:2015:400, paragraph 26, and of 10 December 2018, Wightman and Others, C‑621/18, EU:C:2018:999, paragraph 30).

B. v Centre public d'action sociale de Líège (CPAS) (C-233/19)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections