Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
QH v Varhoven kasatsionen sad na Republika Bulgaria and CV v Iccrea Banca SpA (C-762/18, C-37/19)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question in Case C‑762/18
55

QH v Varhoven kasatsionen sad na Republika Bulgaria and CV v Iccrea Banca SpA (C-762/18, C-37/19)

Judgment of 25 Jun 2020law://eu/cjeu/2018/c-762-18/para_55@2026-11-11

55In addition, as the Court has previously held, the right to paid annual leave cannot be interpreted restrictively (judgment of 30 June 2016, Sobczyszyn, C‑178/15, EU:C:2016:502, paragraph 21 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Cases: C-762/18, C-37/19 · ECLI:EU:C:2020:504
Decided: 25 Jun 2020
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Rayonen sad Haskovo (District Court, Haskovo, Bulgaria) (C‑762/18) and from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Supreme Court of Cassation, Italy) (C‑37/19)
Applicants: QH; CV
Defendants: Varhoven kasatsionen sad na Republika Bulgaria; interested party:; Prokuratura na Republika Bulgaria; Iccrea Banca SpA
Rapporteur: R. Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General: G. Hogan
Bench: 5 judges
J.‑C. Bonichot, R. Silva de Lapuerta, L. Bay Larsen, C. Toader, N. Jääskinen
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018CJ0762

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of movement for workers Social policy

History · 1 version

25 Jun 2020Reading

Connections

Cited by 8: XT and Others v Keolis Agen SARL (C-271/22); YQ v Ředitelství silnic a dálnic ČR (C-57/22)4 provisions; XP and AR v Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide and St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH (C-518/20); PG v Ministero della Giustizia and Others (C-236/20); DS v Koch Personaldienstleistungen GmbH (C-514/20); XXXX v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-217/20); WD v job-medium GmbH (C-233/20)2 provisions; this act8 provisions
Cites 16: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Anica Milivojević v Raiffeisenbank St. Stefan-Jagerberg-Wolfsberg eGen (C-630/17); Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time; Stadt Wuppertal v Maria Elisabeth Bauer and Volker Willmeroth v Martina Broßonn (C-569/16, C-570/16); Maribel Dominguez v Centre informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique and Préfet de la région Centre (C-282/10); Asociación Nacional de Grandes Empresas de Distribución (ANGED) v Federación de Asociaciones Sindicales (FASGA) and Others (C-78/11); Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time; Sindicatul Familia Constanţa and Others v Direcţia Generală de Asistenţă Socială şi Protecţia Copilului Constanţa (C-147/17); Hans Maschek v Magistratsdirektion der Stadt Wien - Personalstelle Wiener Stadtwerke (C-341/15); Sebastian W. Kreuziger v Land Berlin (C-619/16); Alicja Sobczyszyn v Szkoła Podstawowa w Rzeplinie (C-178/15)2 provisions; Conley King v The Sash Window Workshop Ltd and Richard Dollar (C-214/16); Ministerul Justiţiei and Tribunalul Botoşani v Maria Dicu (C-12/17); European Commission v Guido Strack (C-579/12 RX)