Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Alicja Sobczyszyn v Szkoła Podstawowa w Rzeplinie (C-178/15)
Judgment
Consideration of the question referred
21

Alicja Sobczyszyn v Szkoła Podstawowa w Rzeplinie (C-178/15)

Judgment of 30 Jun 2016law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-178-15/para_21@2026-11-11

21Thirdly, the right to paid annual leave cannot be interpreted restrictively (see judgment of 22 April 2010 in Zentralbetriebsrat der Landeskrankenhäuser Tirols, C‑486/08, EU:C:2010:215, paragraph 29).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Tenth Chamber
Case: C-178/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2016:502
Decided: 30 Jun 2016
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicants: REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia-Śródmieścia we Wrocławiu X Wydział Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych (District Court for Wrocław City Centre, Division No 10 for Labour and Social Security, Poland), made by decision of 1 April 2015, received at the Court on 20 April 2015, in the proceedings; Alicja Sobczyszyn
Defendant: Szkoła Podstawowa w Rzeplinie
Rapporteur: E. Levits
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 3 judges
F. Biltgen, E. Levits, M. Berger
Language: Polish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0178

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of movement for workers Social policy

History · 1 version

30 Jun 2016Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time
Cited by 10: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften eV v Tetsuji Shimizu (C-684/16); Stadt Wuppertal v Maria Elisabeth Bauer and Volker Willmeroth v Martina Broßonn (C-569/16, C-570/16); TF v Sparkasse Südpfalz (C-206/22)2 provisions; XP and AR v Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide and St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH (C-518/20); XXXX v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-217/20); QH v Varhoven kasatsionen sad na Republika Bulgaria and CV v Iccrea Banca SpA (C-762/18, C-37/19)2 provisions; Federación de Trabajadores Independientes de Comercio (Fetico) and Others v Grupo de Empresas DIA S.A. and Twins Alimentación S.A (C-588/18); Sebastian W. Kreuziger v Land Berlin (C-619/16); Ministerul Justiţiei and Tribunalul Botoşani v Maria Dicu (C-12/17); Conley King v The Sash Window Workshop Ltd and Richard Dollar (C-214/16)
Cites 9: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time; KHS AG v Winfried Schulte (C-214/10); Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v Staat der Nederlanden (C-124/05); Zentralbetriebsrat der Landeskrankenhäuser Tirols v Land Tirol (C-486/08)2 provisions; Gerhard Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund and Stringer and Others v Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (C-350/06); Asociación Nacional de Grandes Empresas de Distribución (ANGED) v Federación de Asociaciones Sindicales (FASGA) and Others (C-78/11); Francisco Vicente Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA (C-277/08); Georg Neidel v Stadt Frankfurt am Main (C-337/10)