Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
CO v Comune di Gesturi (C-670/18)
Consideration of the question referred
43

CO v Comune di Gesturi (C-670/18)

law://eu/cjeu/2018/c-670-18/para_43@2026-11-15

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Eighth Chamber
Case: C-670/18 · ECLI:EU:C:2020:272
Decided: 2 Apr 2020
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sardegna (Regional Administrative Court for Sardinia, Italy)
Applicant: CO
Defendant: Comune di Gesturi
Rapporteur: F. Biltgen
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 3 judges
L.S. Rossi, J. Malenovský, F. Biltgen
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018CJ0670

Topics

Principles of Union law Social policy

History · 1 version

2 Apr 2020Reading

Judgment of 2 Apr 2020

43In addition, it is for the competent authorities of the Member States to find the right balance between the different interests involved (judgment of 16 October 2007, Palacios de la Villa, C‑411/05, EU:C:2007:604, paragraph 71).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Directive 2000/78/EC
Cited by 7: CJ v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) (C-389/20); Rechtsanwältin und Notarin v Präsidentin des Oberlandesgerichts Hamm (C-408/23)2 provisions; FK v Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien (C-58/21); European Commission and Council of the European Union v VW and Others (C-116/21 P); Ministero della Giustizia v GN (C-914/19)2 provisions; AB v Olympiako Athlitiko Kentro Athinon – Spyros Louis (C-511/19)2 provisions; VK v An Bord Pleanála (C-739/19)
Cites 16: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Directive 2000/78/EC; Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Wiener Landesregierung and Oberösterreichische Landesregierung (C-169/07); Berlington Hungary Tanácsadó és Szolgáltató kft and Others v Magyar Állam (C-98/14); Sindicatul Cadrelor Militare Disponibilizate în rezervă și în retragere (SCMD) v Ministerul Finanțelor Publice (C-262/14); Elodie Giersch and Others v État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (C-20/12); Abercrombie & Fitch Italia Srl v Antonino Bordonaro (C-143/16); Gerhard Fuchs and Peter Köhler v Land Hessen (C-159/10, C-160/10); Werner Mangold v Rüdiger Helm (C-144/04); Domnica Petersen v Berufungsausschuss für Zahnärzte für den Bezirk Westfalen-Lippe (C-341/08); Félix Palacios de la Villa v Cortefiel Servicios SA (C-411/05)2 provisions; Ingeniørforeningen i Danmark v Region Syddanmark (C-499/08); Pólus Vegas Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (C-665/18); Torsten Hörnfeldt v Posten Meddelande AB (C-141/11); David Hütter v Technische Universität Graz (C-88/08)