Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission (C-99/17 P)
V.The appeal
B.The second ground of appeal, allegin…
3.The third part of the second ground…
(b)Findings of the Court
174

Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission (C-99/17 P)

Judgment of 26 Sept 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-99-17/para_174@2026-11-10

174In the present case, in accordance with that case-law, the General Court observed, in paragraph 226 of the judgment under appeal, that the finding of the existence of a single infringement is separate from the question whether liability for that infringement as a whole is imputable to an undertaking.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-99/17 P · ECLI:EU:C:2018:773
Decided: 26 Sept 2018
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Infineon Technologies AG
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: K. Jürimäe
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, C. Vajda, E. Juhász, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0099

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

26 Sept 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 20: Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency (C-136/24 P); UBS Group AG, venant aux droits de Credit Suisse Group AG and Others v European Commission (T-84/22)2 provisions; Victor Petrov v Council of the European Union (T-344/24); UBS Group AG and Others v European Commission (T-441/21); Marina Tauber v Council of the European Union (T-493/23); Ilan Mironovich Shor v Council of the European Union (T-489/23); HSBC Holdings plc and Others v European Commission (T-561/21); Harley-Davidson Europe Ltd and Neovia Logistics Services International v European Commission (C-297/23 P); Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Commission (T-386/21)2 provisions; thyssenkrupp AG v European Commission (C-581/22 P); Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission (T-671/19); Conserve Italia - Consorzio Italiano fra cooperative agricole Soc. coop. agr. and Conserves France v European Commission (T-59/22); International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission (T-509/21); Crédit agricole SA and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v European Commission (T-113/17)2 provisions; JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Others v European Commission (T-106/17); Bulgarian Energy Holding EAD and Others v European Commission (T-136/19); Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation v European Commission (C-759/21); Intermarché Casino Achats v European Commission (C-693/20 P)2 provisions; Casino, Guichard-Perrachon and Achats Marchandises Casino SAS (AMC) v European Commission (C-690/20 P); Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises SAS v European Commission (C-682/20 P)2 provisions
Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Dalmine SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-407/04 P); European Commission v Verhuizingen Coppens NV (C-441/11 P); E.ON Energie AG v European Commission (C-89/11 P); Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Timab Industries and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) v European Commission (C-411/15 P); Galp Energía España SA and Others v European Commission (C-603/13 P); Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon v European Commission (C-386/10 P); SKW Stahl-Metallurgie GmbH and SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG v European Commission (C-154/14 P); Siemens AG and Others v European Commission (C-239/11); FSL Holdings and Others v European Commission (C-469/15 P); BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-43/15 P); Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. v European Commission and European Commission v Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc (C-293/13 P, C-294/13 P); Lafarge SA v European Commission (C-413/08 P); Versalis SpA v European Commission (C-511/11 P); William Prym GmbH & Co. KG and Prym Consumer GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (C-534/07); Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe v European Commission (C-286/13 P); Telefónica SA v European Commission (C-487/16); Team Relocations NV and Others v European Commission (C-444/11); T-Mobile Netherlands BV, KPN Mobile NV, Orange Nederland NV and Vodafone Libertel NV v Raad van bestuur van de Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit (C-8/08)