Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Anica Milivojević v Raiffeisenbank St. Stefan-Jagerberg-Wolfsberg eGen (C-630/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
Article 56 TFEU
67

Anica Milivojević v Raiffeisenbank St. Stefan-Jagerberg-Wolfsberg eGen (C-630/17)

Judgment of 14 Feb 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-630-17/para_67@2026-11-10

67Recourse to such justification presupposes the existence of a genuine, sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society (judgment of 21 January 2010, Commission v Germany, C‑546/07, EU:C:2010:25, paragraph 49 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-630/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2019:123
Decided: 14 Feb 2019
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Općinski sud u Rijeci — Stalna služba u Rabu (Municipal Court of Rijeka, Permanent Division, Island of Rab, Croatia)
Applicant: Anica Milivojević
Defendant: Raiffeisenbank St. Stefan-Jagerberg-Wolfsberg eGen
Rapporteur: C. Toader
Advocate General: E. Tanchev
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, A. Prechal, C. Toader, A. Rosas, M. Ilešič
Language: Croatian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0630

Topics

Freedom to provide services Free movement of capital Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

14 Feb 2019Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EU) No 1215/20125 provisions
Cited by 15: Obala i lučice d.o.o. v NLB Leasing d.o.o (C-307/19); I.S. and K.S. v YYY. S.A (C-570/21)2 provisions; A.H. v Zagrebačka banka d.d (C-567/20); Jana Petruchová v FIBO Group Holdings Limited (C-208/18); AS 'PrivatBank' and Others v Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija (C-78/21); G.M.K.-Z.B.M. v S.O (C-99/24); JA v Wurth Automotive GmbH (C-177/22); Ellmes Property Services Limited v SP (C-433/19); European Commission v Hungary (C-769/22); Criminal proceedings against MA (C-56/25); SN and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-540/22)2 provisions; Fastweb SpA and Others v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (C-468/20); Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v D.-H. T. as liquidator of J & S Service UG (C-620/19); QH v Varhoven kasatsionen sad na Republika Bulgaria and CV v Iccrea Banca SpA (C-762/18, C-37/19); PI v Landespolizeidirektion Tirol (C-230/18)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012; Wolfgang Schmidt v Christiane Schmidt (C-417/15); Virpi Komu and Others v Pekka Komu and Jelena Komu (C-605/14); Johann Gruber v Bay Wa AG (C-464/01); Irmengard Weber v Mechthilde Weber (C-438/12); Francesco Benincasa v Dentalkit Srl (C-269/95); Online Games Handels GmbH and Others v Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich (C-685/15); Alpine Investments BV v Minister van Financiën (C-384/93); Aziz Melki and Sélim Abdeli (C-188/10, C-189/10); Fidium Finanz AG v Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (C-452/04); Citroën Belux NV v Federatie voor Verzekerings- en Financiële Tussenpersonen (FvF) (C-265/12); SC Volksbank România SA v Autoritatea Naţională pentru Protecţia Consumatorilor — Comisariatul Judeţean pentru Protecţia Consumatorilor Călăraşi (CJPC) (C-602/10); European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (C-546/07); Criminal proceedings against Rosanna Laezza (C-375/14); Criminal proceedings against Domenico Politanò (C-225/15); Stichting Collectieve Antennevoorziening Gouda and others v Commissariaat voor de Media (C-288/89); Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Beata Pokrzeptowicz-Meyer (C-162/00); Cristiano Blanco and Pier Paolo Fabretti v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Roma — Ufficio Controlli (C-344/13, C-367/13); Criminal proceedings against Ernst Engelmann (C-64/08)