Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Neculai Tarola v Minister for Social Protection (C-483/17)
Consideration of the question referred
45

Neculai Tarola v Minister for Social Protection (C-483/17)

Judgment of 11 Apr 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-483-17/para_45@2026-11-11

45By contrast, a Union citizen who has pursued an activity in an employed or self-employed capacity in the host Member State for a period of less than one year retains his status of worker only for a period of time which that Member State may determine, provided it is no less than six months.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-483/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2019:309
Decided: 11 Apr 2019
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Court of Appeal (Ireland)
Applicant: Neculai Tarola
Defendant: Minister for Social Protection
Rapporteur: M. Vilaras
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 5 judges
M. Vilaras, J. Malenovský, L. Bay Larsen, M. Safjan, D. Šváby
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0483

Topics

Freedom of movement for workers Right of entry and residence

History · 1 version

11 Apr 2019Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance)
Cited by 9: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Planet49 GmbH (C-673/17); WA v Direcţia pentru Evidenţa Persoanelor şi Administrarea Bazelor de Date din Ministerul Afacerilor Interne (C-491/21); Minister for Justice v I.T (C-477/24)2 provisions; Finanziaria d'investimento Fininvest SpA (Fininvest) and Silvio Berlusconi v European Central Bank (T-913/16); G. M. A. v État belge (C-710/19); State Street Bank International GmbH v Banca d'Italia (C-255/18); „Elektrorazpredelenie Yug“ EAD v Komisia za energiyno i vodno regulirane (KEVR) (C-31/18); The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v Henrika Dakneviciute (C-544/18); WESTbahn Management GmbH v ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG (C-210/18)
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance); Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-583/11 P); Relu Adrian Coman and Others v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări and Ministerul Afacerilor Interne (C-673/16); Jobcenter Berlin Neukölln v Nazifa Alimanovic and Others (C-67/14); Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Taous Lassal (C-162/09); Minister voor Vreemdelingenzaken en Integratie v R. N. G. Eind (C-291/05); H. T. v Land Baden-Württemberg (C-373/13); Florea Gusa v Minister for Social Protection and Others (C-442/16); Tomasz Ziolkowski and Barbara Szeja and Others v Land Berlin (C-424/10, C-425/10); Thomas Pringle v Government of Ireland and Others (C-370/12); Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v Peter Brey (C-140/12); Jessy Saint Prix v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (C-507/12); Blaise Baheten Metock and Others v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (C-127/08); Rafal Prefeta v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (C-618/16); Neculai Tarola v Minister for Social Protection (C-483/17); Vestische Arbeit Jobcenter Kreis Recklinghausen v Jovanna García-Nieto and Others (C-299/14)