Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Italian Republic (C-621/16 P)
The appeal
The first ground of appeal, relating t…
Findings of the Court
–The fourth part of the first ground o…
45

European Commission v Italian Republic (C-621/16 P)

Judgment of 26 Mar 2019law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-621-16/para_45@2026-11-10

45Since confirmatory and purely implementing measures do not produce such legal effects, they fall outside the scope of that article (see, to that effect, judgment of 12 September 2006, Reynolds Tobacco and Others v Commission, C‑131/03 P, EU:C:2006:541, paragraph 55 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-621/16 P · ECLI:EU:C:2019:251
Decided: 26 Mar 2019
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Italian Republic
Rapporteur: A. Rosas
Advocate General: M. Bobek
Bench: 13 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.-C. Bonichot, M. Vilaras, E. Regan, F. Biltgen, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, A. Rosas, E. Juhász, J. Malenovský, E. Levits, L. Bay Larsen
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0621

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

26 Mar 2019Reading

Connections

Cited by 23: Yavor Markov v European Commission (C-31/25 P); European Commission v EO (C-385/24); ZY v European Commission (T-618/23); French Republic v European Commission (T-7/23); VT v European Commission (T-216/23); UJ and Others v European Commission (T-120/23); French Republic v European Commission (T-555/22)2 provisions; Council of the European Union v Laurent Pech (C-408/21); European Central Bank v Crédit lyonnais (C-389/21 P); Brunswick Bowling Products LLC v European Commission (C-694/21); European Commission v Italian Republic and Kingdom of Spain (C-635/20 P); European Commission v Italian Republic (C-623/20 P); Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission (T-469/20); MZ v European Commission (T-631/20); Antonio Del Valle Ruíz and Others v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (T-510/17); Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and Stiftung für Forschung und Lehre (SFL) v Single Resolution Board (T-481/17); Eleveté Invest Group, SL and Others v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (T-523/17); Algebris (UK) Ltd and Anchorage Capital Group LLC v European Commission (T-570/17); European Commission v Freistaat Bayern and Others (C-167/19 P); NRW. Bank v Single Resolution Board (SRB) (C-662/19 P)2 provisions; Sebastian Veit v European Central Bank (C-272/20 P); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-554/19); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-355/18)
Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Hungary v European Commission (C-31/13 P); Europese Gemeenschap v Otis NV and Others (C-199/11); International Business Machines Corporation v Commission of the European Communities (60/81); Kingdom of Belgium v European Commission (C-16/16 P); EEC Council: Regulation No 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community; Commission of the European Communities v Greencore Group plc (C-123/03 P); Deutsche Post AG and Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-463/10 P); Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon v European Commission (C-386/10 P); Italian Republic v European Commission (C-566/10 P); R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. and Others v Commission of the European Communities (C-131/03 P)2 provisions; BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-43/15 P); Jean-Marc Bosman v Commission of the European Communities (C-117/91); Kone Oyj and Others v European Commission (C-510/11); Romania v European Commission (C-599/15 P); Council Regulation (EU) No 517/2013 of 13 May 2013 adapting certain regulations and decisions in the fields of free movement of goods, freedom of movement for persons, company law, competition policy, agriculture, food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy, transport policy, energy, taxation, statistics, trans-European networks, judiciary and fundamental rights, justice, freedom and security, environment, customs union, external relations, foreign, security and defence policy and institutions, by reason of the accession of the Republic of Croatia; Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union; Italian Republic v European Commission (T-353/14); Commission of the European Communities v Tetra Laval BV (C-12/03 P)