Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Nikolay Kantarev v Balgarska Narodna Banka (C-571/16)
Consideration of the questions referred
Substance
The first and second questions
120

Nikolay Kantarev v Balgarska Narodna Banka (C-571/16)

Judgment of 4 Oct 2018law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-571-16/para_120@2026-11-12

120It should be noted from the outset that, according to the Court’s case-law, the three conditions referred to in paragraph 94 above are sufficient to give rise to a right to reparation for individuals (judgment of 25 November 2010, Fuß, C‑429/09, EU:C:2010:717, paragraph 65 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-571/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:807
Decided: 4 Oct 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Administrativen sad — Varna (Varna Administrative Court, Bulgaria)
Applicant: Nikolay Kantarev
Defendant: Balgarska Narodna Banka
Intervener: Okrazhna prokuratura — Varna
Rapporteur: J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, E. Levits, A. Borg Barthet, M. Berger, F. Biltgen
Language: Bulgarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0571

Topics

Freedom of establishment

History · 1 version

4 Oct 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 12: Thelen Technopark Berlin GmbH v MN (C-261/20); Malacalza Investimenti Srl and Vittorio Malacalza v European Central Bank (T-134/21); Papier Mettler Italia S.r.l. v Ministero della Transizione Ecologica and Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico (C-86/22); JP v Ministre de la Transition écologique and Premier ministre (C-61/21); ABLV Bank AS v Single Resolution Board (T-280/18); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-278/20); BT v Balgarska Narodna Banka (C-501/18)5 provisions; Euromin Holdings (Cyprus) Limited (C-735/19); Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri v BV (C-129/19); ML v Aktiva Finants OÜ (C-433/18); AW and Others v Lietuvos valstybė and Lietuvos valstybė (C-417/18); Hochtief Solutions AG Magyarországi Fióktelepe v Fővárosi Törvényszék (C-620/17)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Dragoș Constantin Târșia v Statul român and Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere si Inmatriculare a Autovehiculelor (C-69/14); Stichting Natuur en Milieu and Others v College van Gedeputeerde Staten van Groningen and College van Gedeputeerde Staten van Zuid-Holland (C-166/09 and C-167/09) (C-165/09, C-166/09, C-167/09); Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci and others v Italian Republic (C-6/90, C-9/90); Günter Fuß v Stadt Halle (C-429/09)2 provisions; Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and The Queen v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte: Factortame Ltd and others (C-46/93, C-48/93); Nikolay Kantarev v Balgarska Narodna Banka (C-571/16); Lucio Cesare Aquino v Belgische Staat (C-3/16); Gerhard Köbler v Republik Österreich (C-224/01); João Filipe Ferreira da Silva e Brito and Others v Estado português (C-160/14); Peter Paul, Cornelia Sonnen-Lütte and Christel Mörkens v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-222/02); Transportes Urbanos y Servicios Generales SAL v Administración del Estado (C-118/08); DEB Deutsche Energiehandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-279/09); Thomas Specht and Others v Land Berlin and Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-501/12, C-502/12, C-503/12, C-504/12, C-505/12, C-506/12, C-540/12, C-541/12); Milena Tomášová v Slovenská republika - Ministerstvo spravodlivosti SR and Pohotovosť s.r.o (C-168/15); Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes; Agnieška Anisimovienė and Others v bankas „Snoras“ AB, in liquidation and Others (C-688/15, C-109/16); Proceedings brought by VĮ „Indėlių ir investicijų draudimas“ and Virgilijus Vidutis Nemaniūnas (C-671/13); José María Pérez Retamero v TNT Express Worldwide Spain SL and Others (C-97/16); Directive 2009/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay (Text with EEA relevance)