Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Crédit mutuel Arkéa v European Central Bank (T-712/15)
III. Law
B. Substance
1. First and second pleas in law conce…
(a)Teleological and contextual interpr…
75

Crédit mutuel Arkéa v European Central Bank (T-712/15)

law://eu/cjeu/2015/t-712-15/para_75@2026-11-13

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-712/15 · ECLI:EU:T:2017:900
Decided: 13 Dec 2017
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Crédit Mutuel Arkéa
Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB)
Rapporteur: M. Prek
Bench: 5 judges
M. Prek, E. Buttigieg, F. Schalin, B. Berke, M.J. Costeira
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015TJ0712

Topics

Economic and monetary policy

History · 1 version

13 Dec 2017Reading

Judgment of 13 Dec 2017

75However, the interpretation of the relevant legislation by an administrative authority cannot bind the EU Courts which have exclusive jurisdiction to interpret EU law, under Article 19 TEU.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 23: Malacalza Investimenti Srl and Vittorio Malacalza v European Central Bank (T-134/21); Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank (T-647/21); Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission (T-536/22); EVH GmbH v European Commission (T-53/21); Naturstrom AG v European Commission (T-60/21); Stadtwerke Leipzig GmbH v European Commission (T-55/21); GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG v European Commission (T-62/21); Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH, formerly GWS Stadtwerke Hameln GmbH v European Commission (T-58/21); TEAG Thüringer Energie AG v European Commission (T-56/21); eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (T-59/21); EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH v European Commission (T-61/21); GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG v European Commission (T-319/20); EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH v European Commission (T-317/20); Stadtwerke Leipzig GmbH v European Commission (T-313/20); EVH GmbH v European Commission (T-312/20); Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Valsabbia Investimenti SpA v European Commission (T-655/19); Alfa Acciai SpA v European Commission (T-656/19); Crédit agricole SA v European Central Bank (T-576/18)2 provisions; Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v European Central Bank (T-577/18); VQ v European Central Bank (T-203/18); CA Consumer Finance v European Central Bank (T-578/18); CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd v European Commission (T-399/16)2 provisions; Crédit Mutuel Arkéa v European Central Bank (C-152/18 P, C-153/18 P)
Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Directive 2013/36/EU; Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions (recast); Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013; Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 (ECB/2014/17); Walter Vapenik v Josef Thurner (C-508/12); Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of State for Health (C-547/14); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); Vereniging voor Energie, Milieu en Water and Others v Directeur van de Dienst uitvoering en toezicht energie (C-17/03); Technische Universität München v Hauptzollamt München-Mitte (C-269/90); Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union (T-341/07); People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council of the European Union (T-256/07); The Queen v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Secretary of State for Health, ex parte: Fedesa and others (C-331/88); Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities (C-405/07); EDP - Energias de Portugal, SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-87/05); Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Communities (22/70); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-525/04 P); SELEX Sistemi Integrati SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-155/04); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-400/99); Commission of the European Communities and French Republic v Télévision française 1 SA (TF1) (C-302/99 P, C-308/99 P)