Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Hörmann Reisen GmbH v Stadt Augsburg and Landkreis Augsburg (C-292/15)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first and second questions
45

Hörmann Reisen GmbH v Stadt Augsburg and Landkreis Augsburg (C-292/15)

Judgment of 27 Oct 2016law://eu/cjeu/2015/c-292-15/para_45@2026-11-11

45The fact that Regulation No 1370/2007, by its nature, seeks to provide for methods of intervention in general schemes for public contracts implies that it contains special rules in relation to such schemes.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-292/15 · ECLI:EU:C:2016:817
Decided: 27 Oct 2016
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Vergabekammer Südbayern (Public Procurement Board for Southern Bavaria, Germany)
Applicant: Hörmann Reisen GmbH
Defendants: Stadt Augsburg; Landkreis Augsburg
Rapporteur: E. Juhász
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, E. Juhász, C. Vajda, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62015CJ0292

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services Transport

History · 1 version

27 Oct 2016Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70
Cited by 6: MA.T.I. SUD SpA v Centostazioni SpA and Duemme SGR SpA v Associazione Cassa Nazionale di Previdenza e Assistenza in favore dei Ragionieri e Periti Commerciali (CNPR) (C-523/16, C-536/16); Stefan Rudigier (C-518/17)2 provisions; 'Latvijas Sabiedriskais Autobuss' SIA v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and 'Autotransporta direkcija' VSIA (C-684/23); SIA 'DOBELES AUTOBUSU PARKS' and Others v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and VSIA 'Autotransporta direkcija' (C-421/22)2 provisions; Sotsiaalministeerium v Riigi Tugiteenuste Keskus (C-6/20); Rhein-Sieg-Kreis v Verkehrsbetrieb Hüttebräucker GmbH and BVR Busverkehr Rheinland GmbH and Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG v Kreis Heinsberg (C-266/17, C-267/17)2 provisions
Cites 7: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors; Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance; Bundesdruckerei GmbH v Stadt Dortmund (C-549/13); Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70; Partner Apelski Dariusz v Zarząd Oczyszczania Miasta (C-324/14)