Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Republic of Cyprus v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-292/14, T-293/14)
Judgment
Law
The first ground of complaint: Regulat…
35

Republic of Cyprus v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-292/14, T-293/14)

Judgment of 7 Oct 2015law://eu/cjeu/2014/t-292-14/para_35@2026-11-12

35Secondly, OHIM is right to state that Regulation No 207/2009 does not provide for the protection of certification marks. That regulation provides for the protection only of individual or collective Community trade marks.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fourth Chamber
Cases: T-292/14, T-293/14 · ECLI:EU:T:2015:752
Decided: 7 Oct 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Republic of Cyprus
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Rapporteur: M. Prek
Bench: 3 judges
M. Prek, I. Labucka, V. Kreuschitz
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014TJ0292

Topics

History · 1 version

7 Oct 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 25: Raquel Maresma Bernal v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-411/25); ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-131/25); Shorts International Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-307/24); Victor Waskito Purwana v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-73/24); Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-89/24); Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-90/24); The Not Company SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-320/23); Beauty Biosciences LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-80/23); Beauty Biosciences LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-81/23); Markt-Pilot GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-22/23); Serge-Paul Corver v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-446/22); Emmentaler Switzerland v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-2/21); uwe JetStream GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-14/22); just-organic.com GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-802/21); Miroslav Labaš v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-58/22); Brand Energy Holdings BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-573/21); Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-598/20); Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-593/19); Timo Beelow v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-702/20); Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-281/19); Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/591; Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-282/19); Refan Bulgaria OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-747/18); A9.com, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-240/19); LegalCareers GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-686/18)
Cites 24: Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance); Streamserve Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-106/00); Audi AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-16/02); Marques de l’État de Monaco (MEM) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-197/13); Formula One Licensing BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Global Sports Media Ltd (C-196/11 P); Procter & Gamble Company v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-383/99 P); Deutsche SiSi-Werke GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-173/04 P); Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions- und Vertriebs GmbH (WSC) v Boots- und Segelzubehör Walter Huber and Franz Attenberger (C-108/97, C-109/97); Naipes Heraclio Fournier, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-160/02, T-161/02, T-162/02); Telefon & Buch Verlagsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-322/03); PromoCell bioscience alive GmbH Biomedizinische Produkte v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-113/09); Paul Hartmann AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-123/10); Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-534/10); Magdalena Fernández v European Commission (T-90/92); ABC-One Produktions- und Vertriebs GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-61/12); BORCO-Marken-Import Matthiesen GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-405/04); Hermann Wite v European Parliament (188/83); Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein GbR, Research and Development v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-386/08); Golf USA, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-230/05); Marie-José Besnard and Others v European Commission (C-55/71, C-56/71, C-57/71, C-58/71, C-59/71, C-60/71, C-61/71, C-62/71, C-63/71, C-64/71, C-65/71, C-66/71, C-67/71, C-68/71, C-69/71, C-70/71, C-71/71, C-72/71, C-73/71, C-74/71, C-75/71, C-76/71, C-86/71, C-87/71, C-95/71); Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-51/10 P); Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company (C-191/01 P); Metso Paper Automation Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-19/04); BioID AG, en liquidation v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-37/03 P)