Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital, SA v European Commission (C-449/14 P)
Judgment
The main appeal
The pleas submitted by the Telefónica…
99

DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital, SA v European Commission (C-449/14 P)

Judgment of 10 Nov 2016law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-449-14/para_99@2026-11-10

99Under Article 174 of the Rules of Procedure, a response shall seek to have the appeal allowed or dismissed, in whole or in part.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-449/14 P · ECLI:EU:C:2016:848
Decided: 10 Nov 2016
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital SA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: E. Regan
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, E. Regan, A. Arabadjiev, C.G. Fernlund, S. Rodin
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0449

Topics

History · 1 version

10 Nov 2016Reading

Connections

Cited by 15: Safa Nicu Sepahan Co. v Council of the European Union (C-45/15 P)2 provisions; European Union Intellectual Property Office v Nowhere Co. Ltd (C-337/22 P); Global Nanotechnologies AE schediasmou anaptyxis paraskevis kai emporias ylikon nanotechnologias (Glonatech) v European Research Executive Agency (C-114/24 P); European Commission v Intel Corporation Inc (C-240/22 P); Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-326/21); Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission (T-616/18); Viesgo Infraestructuras Energéticas SL v Administración General del Estado and Others (C-683/19); Tempus Energy Germany GmbH and T Energy Sweden AB v European Commission (T-167/19); Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland and Others v European Commission (C-817/18 P)2 provisions; Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Freistaat Sachsen v European Commission (C-654/17 P); Council of the European Union v Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association (C-465/16 P)2 provisions; European Commission v United Parcel Service, Inc (C-265/17 P); Carrefour Hypermarchés SAS and Others v Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics (C-510/16); Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Others v European Commission (C-66/16 P, C-67/16 P, C-68/16 P, C-69/16 P); TV2/Danmark A/S v European Commission (C-649/15 P)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)8 provisions; Société Régie Networks v Direction de contrôle fiscal Rhône-Alpes Bourgogne (C-333/07); Laboratoires Boiron SA v Union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d'allocations familiales (Urssaf) de Lyon, assuming the rights and obligations of the Agence centrale des organismes de sécurité sociale (ACOSS) (C-526/04); Nazairdis SAS, now Distribution Casino France SAS and Others v Caisse nationale de l'organisation autonome d'assurance vieillesse des travailleurs non salariés des professions industrielles et commerciales (Organic) (C-266/04, C-267/04, C-268/04, C-269/04, C-270/04, C-276/04, C-321/04, C-322/04, C-323/04, C-324/04, C-325/04); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union (C-150/94); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (C-562/07); H.J. Banks & Co. Ltd v The Coal Authority and Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (C-390/98); Streekgewest Westelijk Noord-Brabant v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-174/02, C-175/02); F. J. Pape v Minister van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij (C-175/02); Telefónica SA and Telefónica de España SAU v European Commission (C-295/12 P); DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital, SA v European Commission (T-533/10); Federal Republic of Germany v Council of the European Union (C-399/12); European Commission v Italian Republic (C-334/08); French Republic v European Commission (C-559/12 P); Air Liquide Industries Belgium SA v Ville de Seraing and Province de Liège (C-393/04, C-41/05); Quinn Barlo Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-70/12); Belgische Staat v Eugène Van Calster and Felix Cleeren and Openbaar Slachthuis NV (C-261/01, C-262/01); AEM SpA and AEM Torino SpA v Autorità per l'energia elettrica e per il gas and Others (C-128/03, C-129/03)