Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Partner Apelski Dariusz v Zarząd Oczyszczania Miasta (C-324/14)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referre…
Question 10
92

Partner Apelski Dariusz v Zarząd Oczyszczania Miasta (C-324/14)

Judgment of 7 Apr 2016law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-324-14/para_92@2026-11-11

92In those circumstances, that provision of Directive 2014/24 cannot be used as a criterion for the interpretation of Article 48(3) of Directive 2004/18 since there is no question in the present case of dispelling a problem of interpretation concerning the content of the latter provision.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-324/14 · ECLI:EU:C:2016:214
Decided: 7 Apr 2016
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza (National Appeal Chamber, Poland)
Applicant: Partner Apelski Dariusz
Defendant: Zarząd Oczyszczania Miasta
Rapporteur: A. Tizzano
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, F. Biltgen, E. Levits, M. Berger, S. Rodin
Language: Polish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0324

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

7 Apr 2016Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance
Cited by 13: Județul Neamț and Județul Bacău v Ministerul Dezvoltării Regionale și Administrației Publice (C-260/14, C-261/14); MA.T.I. SUD SpA v Centostazioni SpA and Duemme SGR SpA v Associazione Cassa Nazionale di Previdenza e Assistenza in favore dei Ragionieri e Periti Commerciali (CNPR) (C-523/16, C-536/16); Agentsia „Patna infrastruktura“ v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Transport“ 2007-2013 i direktor na direktsia „Koordinatsia na programi i proekti“ v Ministerstvo na transporta (RUO) (C-471/22)2 provisions; Rad Service Srl Unipersonale and Others v Del Debbio SpA and Others (C-210/20); Proceedings brought by Kauno miesto savivaldybė and Kauno miesto savivaldybės administracija (C-285/18); Stanley International Betting Ltd and Stanleybet Malta Ltd v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli (C-375/17); Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato - Antitrust and Coopservice Soc. coop. arl v Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale della Vallecamonica - Sebino (ASST) and Others (C-216/17); Compania Naţională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA v Ministerul Fondurilor Europene - Direcţia Generală Managementul Fondurilor Externe (C-408/16); Casertana Costruzioni Srl v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti - Provveditorato Interregionale per le opere pubbliche della Campania e del Molise and Azienda Regionale Campana per la Difesa del Suolo - A.R.CA.DI.S (C-223/16)2 provisions; Esaprojekt sp. z o.o. v Województwo Łódzkie (C-387/14); UAB ‘Borta’ v VĮ Klaipėdos valstybinio jūrų uosto direkcija (C-298/15); Hörmann Reisen GmbH v Stadt Augsburg and Landkreis Augsburg (C-292/15); Ambisig – Ambiente e Sistemas de Informação Geográfica SA v AICP – Associação de Industriais do Concelho de Pombal (C-46/15)
Cites 9: Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance; Cartiera dell’Adda SpA v CEM Ambiente SpA (C-42/13); Swm Costruzioni 2 SpA and Mannocchi Luigino DI v Provincia di Fermo (C-94/12); Holst Italia SpA v Comune di Cagliari, intervener: Ruhrwasser AG International Water Management (C-176/98); «Ostas celtnieks» SIA v Talsu novada pašvaldība and Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs (C-234/14); Partner Apelski Dariusz v Zarząd Oczyszczania Miasta (C-324/14); Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser v Manova A/S (C-336/12); Impresa Pizzarotti & C. SpA v Comune di Bari and Others (C-213/13)