Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Ante Šumelj and Others v European Commission (T-546/13, T-108/14, T-109/14)
Judgment
Procedure and forms of order sought
33

Ante Šumelj and Others v European Commission (T-546/13, T-108/14, T-109/14)

Judgment of 26 Feb 2016law://eu/cjeu/2013/t-546-13/para_33@2026-11-11

33By applications lodged at the Court Registry on 20 September 2013 (Case T‑546/13) and 17 February 2014 (Cases T‑108/14 and T‑109/14), the applicants brought the present actions.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber
Cases: T-546/13, T-108/14, T-109/14 · ECLI:EU:T:2016:107
Decided: 26 Feb 2016
Procedure: Action for damages
Applicant: Ante Šumelj
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: S. Gervasoni
Bench: 3 judges
M.E. Martins Ribeiro, S. Gervasoni, L. Madise
Language: Croatian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013TJ0546

Topics

Law governing the institutions

History · 1 version

26 Feb 2016Reading

Connections

Cited by 3: Malacalza Investimenti Srl and Vittorio Malacalza v European Central Bank (T-134/21); JF v EUCAP Somalia (T-194/20); this act
Cites 15: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Arcelor SA v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (T-16/04); Laboratoires pharmaceutiques Bergaderm SA and Jean-Jacques Goupil v Commission of the European Communities (C-352/98 P); J. M. Mulder and others and Otto Heinemann v Council of the European Communities and Commission of the European Communities (C-104/89, C-37/90); Emesa Sugar (Free Zone) NV v Council of the European Union (T-43/98); this act; Efisol SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-336/94); Muhamad Mugraby v Council of the European Union and European Commission (C-581/11); Edouard Dubois et Fils SA v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (T-113/96); Thomas O'Dwyer, Thomas Keane, Thomas Cronin and James Reidy v Council of the European Union (T-466/93, T-469/93, T-473/93, T-474/93, T-477/93); Gap SA granen & producten NV v European Commission (T-437/10); Artegodan GmbH v European Commission (C-221/10 P); Société des plantations de Mbanga SA (SPM) v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (T-128/05); Koinopraxia Enóséon Georgikon Synetairismon Diacheiríséos Enchorion Proïonton Syn. PE (KYDEP) v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-146/91)