Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (F-106/13, F-25/14)
Judgment
Procedure and forms of order sought
2.Case F‑25/14
40

DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (F-106/13, F-25/14)

Judgment of 8 Oct 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/f-106-13/para_40@2026-11-10

40On 2 October 2014 and 6 March 2015 respectively, the FRA made two new offers of evidence in Case F‑25/14, seeking to confirm the irreparable nature of the breakdown in the relationship of trust between the applicant and his management.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Civil Service Tribunal · Second Chamber
Cases: F-106/13, F-25/14 · ECLI:EU:F:2015:118
Decided: 8 Oct 2015
Procedure: staff cases inadmissible
Applicant: DD
Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)
Rapporteur: H. Kreppel
Bench: 3 judges
K. Bradley, H. Kreppel, M. I. Rofes i Pujol
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013FJ0106

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

8 Oct 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 13: DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (C-587/21 P); DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (C-130/22 P); DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (C-680/22 P); DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (T-470/20); DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (T-703/19); DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (T-632/19); BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (T-838/16); RY v European Commission (T-160/17); Erik Josefsson v European Parliament (T-566/16); DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (T-742/15); GV v European External Action Service (F-137/14); Stéphane De Loecker v European External Action Service (F-34/15); this act
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Pia Landgren v Fondation européenne pour la formation (F-1/05); Nicola Delcroix v European External Action Service (EEAS) (F-11/13); Giorgio Lebedef v Commission of the European Communities (T-175/02); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); François Vainker v European Parliament (C-293/87); Kamino International Logistics BV and Datema Hellmann Worldwide Logistics BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-129/13, C-130/13); Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin; Z v Court of Justice of the European Union (F-88/09); Z v Court of Justice of the European Union (T-88/13 P); Fernando Valenzuela Marzo v Commission of the European Communities (T-384/02); this act; Ingfried Hochbaum and Edward Rawes v European Commission (C-44/85); Alex Milbert and Others v European Commission (T-434/04); Nicole Petrilli v European Commission (F-98/07); Arnaldo Lucaccioni v European Commission (T-165/95)