Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Council of the European Union v European Commission (C-409/13)
Judgment
The action
Findings of the Court
76

Council of the European Union v European Commission (C-409/13)

Judgment of 14 Apr 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-409-13/para_76@2026-11-10

76Consequently, if the Commission, after submitting a proposal under the ordinary legislative procedure, decides to withdraw that proposal, it must state to the Parliament and the Council the grounds for the withdrawal, which, in the event of challenge, have to be supported by cogent evidence or arguments.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-409/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:217
Decided: 14 Apr 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Council of the European Union
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: K. Lenaerts
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 15 judges
V. Skouris, K. Lenaerts, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, T. von Danwitz, C. Vajda, S. Rodin, K. Jürimäe, A. Rosas, E. Juhász, A. Borg Barthet, J. Malenovský, E. Levits, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, F. Biltgen
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0409

Topics

Law governing the institutions

History · 1 version

14 Apr 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 17: KS and Others v Council of the European Union and Others (C-29/22 P); European Commission v Council of the European Union (C-551/21); Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (T-7/19); European Commission v Council of the European Union (C-24/20); European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) v European Commission (C-928/19 P)4 provisions; ClientEarth v European Investment Bank (T-9/19); European Commission and Slovak Republic v Dôvera zdravotná poistʼovňa, a.s (C-262/18 P, C-271/18 P); Patrick Grégor Puppinck and Others v European Commission (C-418/18 P)3 provisions; European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission (T-310/18)2 provisions; ClientEarth v European Commission (C-57/16 P); Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-5/16); European Citizens' Initiative One of Us and Others v European Commission (T-561/14); Michael Efler and Others v European Commission (T-754/14); Union pour l'unité (U4U) and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (T-17/14); Council of the European Union v European Commission (C-660/13); ClientEarth v European Commission (T-424/14, T-425/14)3 provisions; Council of the European Union v European Commission (C-73/14)
Cites 9: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Meroni & Co., Industrie Metallurgiche, SpA v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community (C-9/56); Council of the European Union v Nadiany Bamba (C-417/11 P); Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union (C-370/07); European Parliament v Council of the European Communities (C-70/88); Société française des Biscuits Delacre e.a. v Commission of the European Communities (C-350/88); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-133/06); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-65/93)