Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-317/13, C-679/13)
Judgment
The applications
The request to maintain the effects of…
72

European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-317/13, C-679/13)

Judgment of 16 Apr 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-317-13/para_72@2026-11-10

72In that regard, it must be borne in mind that, under the second paragraph of Article 264 TFEU, the Court may, if it considers it necessary to do so, state which of the effects of an act that it has declared void are to be considered as definitive.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Cases: C-317/13, C-679/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:223
Decided: 16 Apr 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: Decision 2013/129, Decision 2013/496
Applicant: European Parliament
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, K. Jürimäe, J. Malenovský, M. Safjan, A. Prechal
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0317

Topics

Justice and home affairs Police cooperation

History · 1 version

16 Apr 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: 2013/496/EU: Council Implementing Decision of 7 October 2013 on subjecting 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole to control measures; 2013/129/EU: Council Decision of 7 March 2013 on subjecting 4-methylamphetamine to control measures
Cited by 9: European Commission v Hungary (C-179/14); MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, initially Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank (T-632/22); Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-699/17)2 provisions; Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission (T-339/16, T-352/16, T-391/16)2 provisions; Transtec v European Commission (T-616/15); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-14/15, C-116/15)3 provisions; European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-595/14)3 provisions; European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-363/14); this act10 provisions
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Christopher Sturgeon, Gabriel Sturgeon and Alana Sturgeon v Condor Flugdienst GmbH and Stefan Böck and Cornelia Lepuschitz v Air France SA (C-402/07); Herbert Schaible v Land Baden-Württemberg (C-101/12); Schindler Holding Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-501/11 P); Efir OOD v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (C-19/12); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-130/10); Claudia Gualtieri v European Commission (C-485/08); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-658/11); Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union (C-370/07); French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-233/02); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-133/06); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-65/93); European Commission v Guido Strack (C-579/12 RX); European Commission v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-43/12); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-417/93); Council Decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union (C-209/13); 2013/129/EU: Council Decision of 7 March 2013 on subjecting 4-methylamphetamine to control measures; 2013/496/EU: Council Implementing Decision of 7 October 2013 on subjecting 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole to control measures; Ermioni Komninou and Others v Commission of the European Communities (C-167/06)