Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Guido Strack v European Commission (C-127/13 P)
Judgment
The main appeal
The fifth ground of appeal
Findings of the Court
107

Guido Strack v European Commission (C-127/13 P)

Judgment of 2 Oct 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-127-13/para_107@2026-11-11

107On the contrary, it is for the person applying for access to establish the necessity of transferring that data (see judgment in Commission v Bavarian Lager, EU:C:2010:378, paragraph 77).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-127/13 P · ECLI:EU:C:2014:2250
Decided: 2 Oct 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62007TJ0392
Applicant: Guido Strack
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: J.-C. Bonichot
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 4 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça G. Arestis, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0127

Topics

Access to documents Protection of personal data

History · 1 version

2 Oct 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Guido Strack v European Commission (T-392/07)
Cited by 25: Emilio De Capitani v Council of the European Union (T-590/23); MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board (T-291/23); Milan Zver v European Commission (T-235/24); Citizens' Committee of the European Citizens' Initiative "Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe" v European Commission (C-26/23); ABLV Bank AS v European Central Bank (T-100/23); EZ v European Commission (T-450/24); eClear AG v European Commission (T-127/23); Rems Kargins v European Commission (T-110/23); Sara Soares v European Commission (T-606/23); JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium v European Commission (C-710/22 P); British American Tobacco Polska Trading sp. z o.o. v European Commission (T-311/23); Herbert Smith Freehills LLP v European Commission (T-570/22); Fabien Courtois and Others v European Commission (T-761/21); European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Indo European Foods Ltd (C-801/21 P); Luisa Izuzquiza and Others v European Parliament (T-375/22); Roberto Acampora and Others v European Commission (T-261/23); XC v European Commission (C-527/21); Robert Stockdale v Council of the European Union and Others (T-776/20); Eurecna SpA v European Commission (T-377/21); Michele Vendrame v European Commission (T-379/21); Covington & Burling and Bart Van Vooren v European Commission (T-201/21); Giorgio Basaglia v European Commission (T-597/21); Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission (T-524/21); Ondřej Múka v European Commission (T-214/21); Pollinis France v European Commission (T-371/20)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data; Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; European Commission v The Bavarian Lager Co. Ltd (C-28/08 P); Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-583/11 P); Union nationale des entraîneurs et cadres techniques professionnels du football (Unectef) v Georges Heylens and others (222/86); Christos Gogos v European Commission (C-583/08 P); Council of the European Union v Heidi Hautala (C-353/99 P); Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN) and Republic of Finland v European Commission (C-514/11 P, C-605/11 P); IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds gGmbH v European Commission (C-135/11 P); E.ON Energie AG v European Commission (C-89/11 P); Anna Maria Campogrande v Commission of the European Communities (C-62/01 P); Ivan Jurašinović v Council of the European Union (C-576/12 P); Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV v European Commission (C-362/08); NDSHT Nya Destination Stockholm Hotell & Teaterpaket AB v European Commission (C-322/09 P); Corus UK Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-199/99 P); Rudy Verzyck v European Commission (225/82); Paulo Sequeira Wandschneider v European Commission (T-110/04); Guido Strack v European Commission (T-392/07); Rousse Industry v European Commission (C-271/13); Guido Strack v European Commission (C-127/13); Groupe Gascogne SA v European Commission (C-58/12 P)