Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Telefónica SA and Telefónica de España SAU v European Commission (C-295/12 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The second ground of appeal, alleging…
90

Telefónica SA and Telefónica de España SAU v European Commission (C-295/12 P)

Judgment of 10 Jul 2014law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-295-12/para_90@2026-11-10

90In the light of the foregoing, as observed by the Advocate General at point 12 of his Opinion, the plea of inadmissibility raised by the Commission, the ECTA, France Telecom and Ausbanc Consumo must be upheld and the second ground of appeal rejected in its entirety as inadmissible.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-295/12 P · ECLI:EU:C:2014:2062
Decided: 10 Jul 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Telefónica SA; Telefónica de España SAU
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: C. Vajda
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, E. Juhász, A. Rosas, D. Šváby, C. Vajda
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0295

Topics

Dominant position

History · 1 version

10 Jul 2014Reading

Connections

Cited by 24: ABLV Bank AS, en liquidation v Single Resolution Board (C-602/22 P); EVH GmbH and Others v European Commission (C-464/23); Regia Autonomă Aeroportul Internaţional 'Avram Iancu' Cluj v Consiliul Concurenţei (C-220/24); HSBC Holdings plc and Others v European Commission (T-561/21); LE v European Commission (C-781/22); Silgan Holdings, Inc. and Others v European Commission (T-589/22); Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission (T-671/19); European Commission v Czech Republic (C-494/22 P); Penya Barça Lyon : Plus que des supporters (PBL) and Issam Abdelmouine v European Commission (C-224/23 P); Crédit agricole SA and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v European Commission (T-113/17); JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Others v European Commission (T-106/17); Altice Group Lux Sàrl v European Commission (C-746/21 P); Bulgarian Energy Holding EAD and Others v European Commission (T-136/19); Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission (C-42/21 P); Maxime Picard v European Commission (C-366/21 P); DB Station & Service AG v ODEG Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn GmbH (C-721/20)2 provisions; SV v European Investment Bank (T-311/21); ABLV Bank AS, in liquidation v Single Resolution Board (SRB) (C-202/21 P); Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp. and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp. v European Commission (C-700/19 P); Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission (T-235/18); European Commission v Hansol Paper Co. Ltd (C-260/20 P); Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-666/19 P); SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (T-324/17); Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-610/19)
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Scarlet Extended SA v Société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs SCRL (SABAM) (C-70/10); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); Schindler Holding Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-501/11 P); E.ON Energie AG v European Commission (C-89/11 P); Commission of the European Communities v Tetra Laval BV (C-12/03 P); Europese Gemeenschap v Otis NV and Others (C-199/11); Konkurrensverket v TeliaSonera Sverige AB (C-52/09); Oscar Bronner GmbH & Co. KG v Mediaprint Zeitungs- und Zeitschriftenverlag GmbH & Co. KG, Mediaprint Zeitungsvertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Mediaprint Anzeigengesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (C-7/97); Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon v European Commission (C-386/10 P); Arkema SA v European Commission (C-520/09 P); Sarrió SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-291/98 P); Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (C-40/12 P); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Kendrion NV v European Commission (C-50/12 P); Groupe Gascogne SA v European Commission (C-58/12 P)