Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Stichting Woonlinie and Others v European Commission (C-133/12 P)
Judgment
Admissibility of the action at first i…
59

Stichting Woonlinie and Others v European Commission (C-133/12 P)

Judgment of 27 Feb 2014law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-133-12/para_59@2026-11-10

59As was noted by the Advocate General in points 43 to 45 of his Opinion, in the context of the procedure under Article 19(1) of Regulation No 659/1999, it is the Commission’s decision recording the proposals of the Member State which renders those proposals binding.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-133/12 P · ECLI:EU:C:2014:105
Decided: 27 Feb 2014
Procedure: application to intervene
Ruled invalid: 62010TO0202
Applicants: Stichting Woonlinie; Stichting Allee Wonen and 3 more
Woningstichting Volksbelang; Stichting WoonInvest; Stichting Woonstede
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: E. Levits
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 3 judges
A. Tizzano, A. Borg Barthet, E. Levits
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0133

Topics

History · 1 version

27 Feb 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Stichting Woonlinie and Others v European Commission (T-202/10)
Cited by 20: Beeren-, Wild-, Feinfrucht GmbH v Hauptzollamt Erfurt (C-825/19); Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-556/23); Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-558/23); Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-557/23); Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-644/22); Naturstrom AG v European Commission (T-60/21); Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH, formerly GWS Stadtwerke Hameln GmbH v European Commission (T-58/21); China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission (C-478/21 P); Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH, formerly GWS Stadtwerke Hameln GmbH v European Commission (T-314/20); Stadtwerke Leipzig GmbH v European Commission (T-313/20); EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH v European Commission (T-317/20); Naturstrom AG v European Commission (T-316/20); GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG v European Commission (T-319/20); TEAG Thüringer Energie AG v European Commission (T-315/20); EVH GmbH v European Commission (T-312/20); eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (T-318/20); Federal Republic of Germany and Others v European Commission (C-177/19 P); Stichting Woonlinie and Others v European Commission (T-202/10 R, T-203/10 R)6 provisions; Scuola Elementare Maria Montessori Srl v European Commission, European Commission v Scuola Elementare Maria Montessori Srl and European Commission v Pietro Ferracci (C-622/16 P, C-623/16 P, C-624/16 P); Georgsmarienhütte GmbH and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-135/16)
Cites 10: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-583/11 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; Plaumann & Co. v Commission of the European Economic Community (C-25/62); Markku Sahlstedt and Others v Commission of the European Communities (C-362/06); Commission of the European Communities v Infront WM AG (C-125/06); Commission of the European Communities v Koninklijke FrieslandCampina NV (C-519/07); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-298/00 P); Meliha Veli Mustafa v Direktor na fond ‘Garantirani vzemania na rabotnitsite i sluzhitelite’ kam Natsionalnia osiguritelen institut (C-247/12); Stichting Woonlinie and Others v European Commission (T-202/10)