Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Schenker AG v European Commission (T-534/11)
Judgment
Law
Substance
The fourth plea, alleging infringement…
–The first part: the existence of an o…
81

Schenker AG v European Commission (T-534/11)

Judgment of 7 Oct 2014law://eu/cjeu/2011/t-534-11/para_81@2026-11-12

81There is, therefore, an overriding public interest in the public being able to ascertain certain essential elements of Commission action in the field of competition.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · First Chamber
Case: T-534/11 · ECLI:EU:T:2014:854
Decided: 7 Oct 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Schenker AG
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: H. Kanninen
Bench: 3 judges
H. Kanninen, I. Pelikánová, E. Buttigieg
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011TJ0534

Topics

Access to documents

History · 1 version

7 Oct 2014Reading

Connections

Cited by 9: ViaSat, Inc. v European Commission (T-649/17); Espírito Santo Financial Group SA v European Central Bank (T-730/16); Espírito Santo Financial (Portugal), SGPS, SA v European Central Bank (T-251/15); MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet international BV v European Medicines Agency (T-729/15); PTC Therapeutics International Ltd v European Medicines Agency (T-718/15); Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-210/15)2 provisions; Deza, a.s. v European Chemicals Agency (T-189/14); Axa Versicherung AG v European Commission (T-677/13)2 provisions; Unión de Almacenistas de Hierros de España v European Commission (T-623/13)2 provisions
Cites 16: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Varec SA v Belgian State (C-450/06); Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission (T-380/08); WWF European Policy Programme v Council of the European Union (T-264/04); Council of the European Union v Heidi Hautala (C-353/99 P); European Commission v Éditions Odile Jacob SAS (C-404/10 P); European Commission v EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (C-365/12 P); Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Ryanair Ltd v European Commission (T-494/08); Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès v European Commission and Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (T-439/08); AKZO Chemie BV and AKZO Chemie UK Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (53/85); Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès v European Commission and Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA, Brussels) (C-626/10); Samenwerkende Elektriciteits-Produktiebedrijven (SEP) NV v Commission of the European Communities (C-36/92 P)