Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Forposta SA and ABC Direct Contact sp. z o.o. v Poczta Polska SA (C-465/11)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
The first question
31

Forposta SA and ABC Direct Contact sp. z o.o. v Poczta Polska SA (C-465/11)

Judgment of 13 Dec 2012law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-465-11/para_31@2026-11-11

31In addition, in order to find whether ‘grave misconduct’ exists, a specific and individual assessment of the conduct of the economic operator concerned must, in principle, be carried out.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-465/11 · ECLI:EU:C:2012:801
Decided: 13 Dec 2012
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza (Poland)
Applicants: Forposta SA; ABC Direct Contact sp. z o.o.
Defendant: Poczta Polska SA
Rapporteur: E. Juhász
Advocate General: J. Mazák
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, E. Juhász, G. Arestis, J. Malenovský, T. von Danwitz
Language: Polish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0465

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

13 Dec 2012Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts
Cited by 14: Walter Endress v Allianz Lebensversicherungs AG (C-209/12)2 provisions; Luxone Srl and Sofein SpA v Consip SpA (C-403/23)2 provisions; Azienda Nazionale Autonoma Strade SpA (ANAS) v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (C-545/21); RH v European Commission (T-175/21); Landkreis Aichach-Friedberg v J. Sch. Omnibusunternehmen and K. Reisen GmbH (C-416/21); Rad Service Srl Unipersonale and Others v Del Debbio SpA and Others (C-210/20)2 provisions; Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation v European Commission (T-314/19); Tim SpA - Direzione e coordinamento Vivendi SA v Consip SpA and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze (C-395/18); Delta Antrepriză de Construcţii şi Montaj 93 SA v Compania Naţională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA (C-267/18)2 provisions; Meca Srl v Comune di Napoli (C-41/18)2 provisions; Esaprojekt sp. z o.o. v Województwo Łódzkie (C-387/14); Vanbreda Risk & Benefits v European Commission (T-199/14)2 provisions; Generali-Providencia Biztosító Zrt v Közbeszerzési Hatóság Közbeszerzési Döntőbizottság (C-470/13)2 provisions; Bundesdruckerei GmbH v Stadt Dortmund (C-549/13)2 provisions
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors; Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; Mednis SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (C-525/11); Dorsch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH v Bundesbaugesellschaft Berlin mbH (C-54/96); Michaniki AE v Ethniko Symvoulio Radiotileorasis and Ypourgos Epikrateias (C-213/07); La Cascina Soc. coop. arl and Zilch Srl v Ministero della Difesa and Others and Consorzio G. f. M. v Ministero della Difesa and La Cascina Soc. coop. arl (C-226/04, C-228/04); Santander Asset Management SGIIC SA, on behalf of FIM Santander Top 25 Euro Fi (C‑338/11) v Directeur des résidents à l'étranger et des services généraux and Santander Asset Management SGIIC SA, on behalf of Cartera Mobiliaria SA SICAV (C‑339/11 to C‑347/11) and Others v Ministre du Budget, des Comptes publics, de la Fonction publique et de la Réforme de l’État (C-338/11, C-339/11, C-340/11, C-341/11, C-342/11, C-343/11, C-344/11, C-345/11, C-346/11, C-347/11); Fabricom SA v Belgian State (C-21/03, C-34/03); Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura (CCIAA) di Cosenza v Grillo Star Srl (C-443/09); Bâtiments et Ponts Construction SA and WISAG Produktionsservice GmbH v Berlaymont 2000 SA (C-74/09); Assitur Srl v Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Milano (C-538/07)