21It was in those circumstances that the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gdańsku decided to stay the proceedings and refer the following questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling:In Case C-213/11:‘Must Article 1(11) of Directive [98/34] be interpreted as meaning that a “technical regulation”, the draft of which must be communicated to the Commission pursuant to Article 8(1) of that directive, includes a legislative provision which prohibits the amendment of authorisations for activity relating to gaming on low-prize machines in respect of a change in the place at which that gaming is organised?’In Case C-214/11:‘Must Article 1(11) of Directive [98/34] be interpreted as meaning that a “technical regulation”, the draft of which must be communicated to the Commission pursuant to Article 8(1) of that directive, includes a legislative provision which prohibits the extension of authorisations for activity relating to gaming on low-prize machines?’In Case C-217/11:‘Must Article 1(11) of Directive [98/34] be interpreted as meaning that a “technical regulation”, the draft of which must be communicated to the Commission pursuant to Article 8(1) of that directive, includes a legislative provision which prohibits the issue of authorisations for activity relating to gaming on low-prize machines?’
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.