Judgment_paragraph 32 · Cindu Chemicals BV and Others v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (T-95/10)

32As regards, first, the plea of inadmissibility relating to the requirements laid down by Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure, it must be observed that the ECHA did not raise that plea. Since the Commission, as an intervening party, is not entitled to raise a plea of inadmissibility which was not raised by the party it is supporting (see, to that effect, Case T-174/95 Svenska Journalistförbundet v Council [1998] ECR II-2289, paragraphs 77 and 78), that plea of inadmissibility must be rejected as inadmissible. In any event, it must be observed that the subject-matter of the dispute was indicated sufficiently clearly and precisely in the application (see paragraph 39 below).

Cindu Chemicals BV and Others v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (T-95/10)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections