71With regard to the ruling in Kadi I, Court of Justice, it is true that, according to settled case-law, the legal effects of a judgment of a Court of the European Union in annulment proceedings concern, apart from the parties, only the persons directly affected by the measure annulled and such a judgment can only constitute a new factor with regard to those persons (Case 43/64Müller v Councils of the EEC, EAEC and ECSC [1965] ECR 385, 397; Case 52/64Pfloeschner v Commission [1965] ECR 981, 987; and Case 125/87Brown v Court of Justice [1988] ECR 1619, paragraph 13; Order of the General Court in Case T-135/95Progoulis v Commission [1995] ECR-SC I-A-297 and II-907, para. 41).