40It should also be pointed out that it must be possible to request the review of a measure which depends on whether the factual and legal circumstances which led to its adoption continue to apply, in order to establish whether its retention is justified (see, in that regard, judgments in M v EMEA, cited in paragraph 28 above, paragraphs 64 to 66, and Case T-306/10 Yusef v Commission [2014] ECR, paragraphs 62 and 63). A re-examination seeking to verify whether a previously-adopted measure remains justified in the light of a change in the legal or factual situation which has taken place in the meantime leads to the adoption of a measure which is not purely confirmatory of the earlier measure, but constitutes a measure open to challenge which could be the subject of an action for annulment under Article 263 TFEU (see, in that regard, judgment in Case C-362/08 P Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission [2010] ECR I-669, paragraphs 56 to 62).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.