Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-207/10)
Law
Substance of the action
40

Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-207/10)

law://eu/cjeu/2010/t-207-10/para_40@2026-11-15

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: General Court · Ninth Chamber
Case: T-207/10 · ECLI:EU:T:2018:786
Decided: 15 Nov 2018
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Deutsche Telekom AG
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: S. Gervasoni
Bench: 3 judges
S. Gervasoni, K. Kowalik–Bańczyk, C. Mac Eochaidh
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010TJ0207

Topics

History · 1 version

15 Nov 2018Reading

Judgment of 15 Nov 2018

40It follows from the case-law that legitimate expectations may protect the beneficiaries of non-notified aid, but only in exceptional circumstances.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 11: Telefónica SA v European Commission (C-274/12 P); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain and Others (C-776/23 P)3 provisions; Millennium BCP Participações, SGPS, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda and BCP África, SGPS, Lda v European Commission (T-462/22); Telefónica SA and Iberdrola, SA v European Commission (T-256/15); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-826/14); Banco Santander, SA and Others v European Commission (T-12/15)4 provisions; Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, SA v European Commission (T-253/15); Ferrovial, SA and Others v European Commission (T-252/15); Achema AB and Lifosa AB v European Commission (T-300/19); International Forum for Sustainable Underwater Activities (IFSUA) v Council of the European Union (T-251/18); Iberdrola, SA v European Commission (T-221/10)2 provisions
Cites 24: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde and Bundeskartellanwalt v Schenker & Co. AG and Others (C-681/11); HGA Srl and Others (C‑630/11 P), Regione autonoma della Sardegna (C‑631/11 P), Timsas srl (C‑632/11 P) and Grand Hotel Abi d’Oru SpA (C‑633/11 P) v European Commission (C-630/11 P, C-631/11 P, C-632/11 P, C-633/11 P); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-403/99); Vereniging voor Energie, Milieu en Water and Others v Directeur van de Dienst uitvoering en toezicht energie (C-17/03); Commission Decision (EU) 2015/314; Kahla Thüringen Porzellan GmbH v European Commission (C-537/08); Rijn-Schelde-Verolme (RSV) Machinefabrieken en Scheepswerven NV v Commission of the European Communities (223/85); Council of the European Union v Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH and C. H. Boehringer Sohn (C-23/00 P); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-310/99); Abdulbasit Abdulrahim v Council of the European Union and European Commission (C-239/12 P); Mory SA and Others v European Commission (C-33/14 P); Jacques Wunenburger v European Commission (C-362/05 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; AJD Tuna Ltd v Direttur tal-Agrikoltura u s-Sajd and Avukat Generali (C-221/09); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-5/89); Cementbouw Handel & Industrie BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-282/02); Di Lenardo Adriano Srl and Dilexport Srl v Ministero del Commercio con l'Estero (C-37/02, C-38/02); Henri de Compte v European Parliament (C-90/95 P); Kingdom of Belgium and Forum 187 ASBL v Commission of the European Communities (C-182/03, C-217/03); Mediaset SpA v European Commission (T-177/07); Société de distribution mécanique et d'automobiles v Commission of the European Communities (C-44/00); British Aggregates Association v Commission of the European Communities and United Kingdom (C-487/06); Reliance Industries Ltd v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (T-45/06)