Judgment_paragraph 52 · Beifa Group Co. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-148/08)

52It follows that, contrary to the assertions made by Beifa Group, a literal interpretation of Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002 does not necessarily preclude the application of that provision where use is made, in a subsequent Community design, not of a sign which is identical to that relied upon in support of the application for a declaration of invalidity, but of a sign which is similar.

Beifa Group Co. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-148/08)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections